Very sly conflation you’re trying to float: “It’s a very serious issue if believers do not really understand that Jesus is come in the Flesh.” Not one person on any of the ‘threads’ you deigned to post has denies that Jesus has come in the flesh. He died in the flesh, too. But He arose the Lord Christ, alive forever more and seated at the Right Hand of the Father Almighty (remember, ‘scholar’, flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom) ... He IS in no need of blood for His Life issues from The Spirit.
You obviously didn’t read the article that constitutes this thread?
All of your assertions were dealt with, handily, including “flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom”...
Context/syntax/definition/idiomatic error on your part.
Please read the article and then refute how the author dealt with your assertion.