I have no idea what you mean by those questions.
So it’s fairly obvious you’re crazy. Airplane time, goodnight.
If crazy means believing Rome, the papacy and pope was/is/are antichrist then yes,I am crazy.
Heck,maybe we can find somewhere that Luther had those same similar opinions. I know afew of the first protesters of Rome believed that.
Has antichrist Rome gained or lost influence over the last 500 years compared to the previous 1500?
I don’t think protesters of Rome really want to take a look at that question because upon reflection,they may see how they give Rome more authority and status by accepting Rome has any Truth at all.
Rome hasn’t lost influence or status.
They are exactly the power and principality for the last about 2000 years of demon possessed unclean (swine) doctrines and teachings. The Reformation rages on because her daughters accept Rome’s power and authority and status.
Let me change Rome to antichrist now, as I certainly accept the premise of the first protesters of Rome.
Antichrist influence, power, authority and status for about 2000 years.
Rome’s daughters really don’t want it framed that way, would they?
I wouldn’t either.
It would make arguing with Rome over their doctrines of demons mean I have accepted the premise that Rome has Truth.
Which it doesn’t.
Crazy talk, I know Luircin.
Happy trails, Adios!
For His Glory!