To: metmom; MHGinTN; amessenger4god; raygunfan
Thanks for reviewing my little supportive contribution to this thread. I am glad that the article was found and presented here. Getting it ready took a lot of work, and the poster is to be commended, IMHO.
It was an outstanding summary that shifted the apologetic basis away from "protesting" and moved the argument to the the theme of "reforming." Obviously, the intent was to highlight what the original Gospel was(="Jesus saves") as compared to some modern presentations that propagate another gospel of a different kind (="the Church saves"), so that the reader might begin to appreciate that the True Gospel is still available and shared.
26 posted on
06/19/2018 11:07:37 PM PDT by
imardmd1
(Fiat Lux)
To: imardmd1; metmom; MHGinTN; amessenger4god
Obviously, the intent was to highlight what the original Gospel was(="Jesus saves") as compared to some modern presentations that propagate another gospel of a different kind (="the Church saves"), so that the reader might begin to appreciate that the True Gospel is still available and shared. Those who are complaining of anti-Catholicism here, no doubt must be the ones who also believe in the "other" gospel that their Church saves them.
63 posted on
06/21/2018 5:55:52 PM PDT by
boatbums
(The Law is a storm which wrecks your hopes of self-salvation, but washes you upon the Rock of Ages.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson