Whoa there....you've made a change in the terminology. It used to be you'd say the unanimous consent of the ECFs....now it's the consensus of the ECFs. That's quite a difference.
Having native premodern Greek-speaking language fluency, and being immersed in the prayer, practice and culture of late-antiquity Christianity, they were much closer to the NT texts and ways of life and worship than, say, a committee of German-speaking skeptics 2,800 miles distant and a millennium and a half later.
And these are the ones who are in disagreement with each other and modern day Rome.
So --- if you prefer, I'll state it differently --- did any Christian say that Catholic communion in the Body and Blood of Christ conflicted with, or was contrary to, the NT until the 16th or 17th century?
As noted before....the ECFs are not in agreement over this issue.
From what I've seen on this issue it was not formalized until the 12th century. That certainly doesn't sound like "consensus" to me.
But again, like so much of Roman Catholicism it developed much later than the NT period.
Maybe about some issues. The date of Easter. The doctrine of Christ's divinity. (Although --- no, I'll take that back. If they disagreed with the doctrine of Christ's divinity, they wouldn't be ECF's. They wouldn't be Christians.) So ---
--- if you prefer, I'll state it differently --- did any Christian or any Christian Church say that Catholic communion in the Body and Blood of Christ conflicted with, or was contrary to, the NT until the 16th or 17th century?
[You say] As noted before....the ECFs are not in agreement over this issue.