Replies

Right,< / sarc> you expect me to believe that you accidentally pinged your posse in your very first post 51 on this thread to the post where you call your pals to join in ATTACKING, which they did by the way, my friendly post, inviting the original poster to share in the joy I have come to know, all the way down thread at post number 31 by calling all Catholics "mostly spiritually dead" instead of the way you "usually ping them to the first post to a new thread."

No, I do not you expect you to believe that i accidentally pinged my "possess" to attack your your "friendly post," but that I purposely pinged them to my first post to the tread, as usual, to see your proselytizing post reproved.

You purposely invited a Protestant "to stop in at any Catholic Church with perpetual adoration" and liked to a propagandist web site as an inducement, and you expect us to no respond to such? I warrants reproof as much as a Mormon invite to his church would.

by calling all Catholics "mostly spiritually dead""

I actually expressed that the congregation is "mostly spiritually dead," which is true, and as said, i speak as a former weekly mass-going RC, CCD teacher and lector who came to know the difference while still a RC.

instead of the way you "usually ping them to the first post to a new thread.

There is no "instead" since for 12 years my first post has usually been on the RF reproving RC. So you need not feel special.

One or two posts, maybe even six would be an accident but THIRTY? Give me a break. You and your six five pals can call your "pun lists" all you like, it wont change a bit how ridiculous you all appear.

You ranting is incoherent. There is no accident, and many RCS as well as others have ping lists by which they initially ping interested (by invitation) FReepers, and there is nothing ridiculous about it: only your angry venting and personal attacks appears so. And as the RM says in the rules ,

Open threads are in a town square format.

Antagonism though not encouraged, should be expected

Posters may argue for or against beliefs, deities, religious authorities, etc. They may tear down other’s beliefs. They may ridicule. “Open” RF debate is often contentious.

It requires thick skin. A poster must be able to make his points while standing his ground, suffering adverse remarks about his beliefs - or letting them roll off his back.

Members of religions which are as much culture as belief sometimes take religious debate personally. If you keep getting your feelings hurt because other posters ridicule or disapprove or hate what you hold dear, then you are too thin-skinned to be involved in “open” RF debate. You should IGNORE “open” RF threads altogether and instead post to RF threads labeled “prayer” “devotional” “caucus” or “ecumenical.”