Posted on 03/19/2018 10:08:27 AM PDT by GregNH
When one observes President Obama’s unwillingness to accommodate America’s four-century long religious conscience protection through his attempts to require Catholics to go against their own doctrines and beliefs, one is tempted to say that he is anti-Catholic. But that characterization would not be correct. Although he has recently singled out Catholics, he has equally targeted traditional Protestant beliefs over the past four years. So since he has attacked Catholics and Protestants, one is tempted to say that he is anti-Christian. But that, too, would be inaccurate. He has been equally disrespectful in his appalling treatment of religious Jews in general and Israel in particular. So perhaps the most accurate description of his antipathy toward Catholics, Protestants, religious Jews, and the Jewish nation would be to characterize him as anti-Biblical. And then when his hostility toward Biblical people of faith is contrasted with his preferential treatment of Muslims and Muslim nations, it further strengthens the accuracy of the anti-Biblical descriptor. In fact, there have been numerous clearly documented times when his pro-Islam positions have been the cause of his anti-Biblical actions.
(Excerpt) Read more at wallbuilders.com ...
Answer post #58 and then we’ll talk.
I asked my questions first.
I did. God has rejected the Old Covenant of the law. Your application of using the law to condemn has been discarded.
Your turn.
In this interview BHO articulates views that are pretty common in so called mainstream American Protestanism. The Salvation by Works idea is even held by many pseudp Evangelicals. His view of Jesus is spot on with much of the so called mainstream Protestant churches.
‘Your application of using the law to condemn has been discarded.’
This is a crazed idea. Where did you get it? It certainly didn’t come from me.
Perhaps if you explained why quotes from Jesus, etc., lead you to make so many baseless allegations, we could get to the heart of the problem. Do you reject the book of James?
A later post linked to a video of Obama mocking Jesus. That is more along the lines of an atheist reaction.
Hebrews 8:13.
The deep state for sure.
I am pro-Bible if not pro-biblical. I have my King James Bible, published by the Philadelphia Bible Company, and presented to me personally in 1958. I keep it by my “desk” and I’ve got it right here, with the loose cover which has a rip in it where my drunken roommate hit it with a belt buckle ( by accident ) my Junior Year in college. I remember the moment.
It still has that new Bible smell.
No date and he’s not president. Why even post this? We all know what a rotten creature he was and we don’t need any reminders. We just have to concentrate on working ourselves out of the hole he put us in...
Don't you to see how big the hole is?
You dismissed an earlier poster who rightly pointed out that Obama is anti-biblical. And you provided in its place an inferior argument. A lot of people claim to have God. The Bible is not silent on this topic of who has God. It is often said that Christians, Jews and Muslims worship the same God. Not according to the Bible.
Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: (but) he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also. (1 John 2:22,23)
What it ultimately boils down to is who(m) does Jesus know.
Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. (Matthew 7:21-23).
There is only one way to be saved and it is to place one's faith in the finished work of Jesus Christ on the cross, not in ones own works. That disqualifies.
Those are the pertinent points, and the post is very timely. Thanks for adding this to the discussion.
The man was and is an agent of political Islam because of it’s destructive nature regarding the west, he has no core religious beliefs unless you regard a belief in leftist revolution as religion.
“”Don’t you to see how big the hole is? “”
Even more reason not to get diverted with what a crumb bum he is and was...That’s a given. Time to repair the damage!
“You dismissed an earlier poster...”
No, I commented on the article. When someone comments to reply #1, they are just commenting on the article.
Not even bothering to read the rest of your comment, as I already told you that I am not interested in the argument you are trying to start, so don’t bother wasting your breath.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.