[piusv]

Moreover, despite the false information that is regularly circulated by the SSPX_resistance crowd, the Sedevacantists sites, and the simply misinformed and gullible Catholics, the SSPX has consistently published their immutable position; namely, that while they will continue to engage in dialogue with the leaders in Rome, they will absolutely never enter into any “agreement” with those leaders until they have agreed to abandon every one of the false teachings of Vatican II.

Please share a recent publication to that effect. What has the SSPX stated officially about Amoris Latitia for example?

Do you know that the SSPX once questioned the validity of the New Rite of Episcopal Consecration ... until 2005....when Benedict was the first "Bishop of Rome" consecrated in it? I find that timing extremely suspect.

The SSPX has changed its tune over the years. There is no question about that.

[tomsbartoo]

Sure, the following two links set forth the Society’s position quite clear. But, as I am sure you are well aware, anti-SSPX sites like Novus Ordo Watch and the SSPX-resistance are as capable as any other lawyer (or Fake News media site) in twisting the words of their opponent in re-presenting anything they say in some critical fashion. https://tinyurl.com/ybpnxtjc https://tinyurl.com/y7cb6cwn As for Amoris Laetitia, the SSPX (like all faithful Catholics) see many heretical issues imbedded in this document. The following link sets out Bishop Fellay’s reasoning for signing the Correctio Filialis which took serious issue with Amoris Laetitia. https://tinyurl.com/ybpnxtjc As for addressing the unending and continual misrepresentations and distortions being generated by sites like Novus Ordo Watch and the like, I would respectfully take a pass on that. I only have the rest of my life which, as I’m sure even you would agree, would not be leave sufficient time. 😄