That’s fine, but not really relevant. Suppose they were atheists, and they had no issues with their daughter’s dressing in jeans and a t-shirt, getting a short haircut, and calling herself “Chris” or “Taylor.” They could still, just using their practical judgment, believe that a teenaged girl’s being given male hormones would be harmful to her.
True. However I don’t think Bible was speaking about way we have unisex clothing today, in form of T-shirts or jeans.
I believe he was addressing cross-dressing for sexual purposes...or changing sexual identities. Society has NO BUSINESS promoting or accepting deviant life styles, yet we have Judges telling people how to run bakeries. SAD!
There are birth defects of both sexes being present that I think are parents responsibility to deal with, through prayer, etc.