I realize that Peterson is no Evangelist, he doesn’t claim to be one, and I don’t accuse him of being one. He is an academic, and a Jungian. What I said is that this is what people interested in his Bible teaching should be mindful of. Is there anything wrong with that?I give Peterson a lot of credit for what he is...
I guess there is nothing wrong with that. I was kinda thinking that was self evident.
I tend to think of Peterson as one who would introduce folks to the depth, logic, and beauty of the story of Christ. You go down that path and eventually come to realize “it is so perfect! It must be true!” getting them to the jumping off point for a kierkegaardian leap of faith as it were :-)