To: tiredofallofit
And, the KJV is common use now is a 1697 (I think) revision of the 1611 version, which was written in Middle English (think Chaucer), that the vast majority of English-speaking people couldn’t read at the point of a gun.
42 posted on
01/27/2018 7:52:58 AM PST by
FNU LNU
(Nothing runs like a Deere, nothing smells like a john)
To: FNU LNU
And, the KJV is common use now is a 1697 (I think) revision of the 1611 version, which was written in Middle English (think Chaucer), that the vast majority of English-speaking people couldnt read at the point of a gun. ... and the Challoner Douay-Rheims is a 1752 revision drawing heavily from the KJV, due to the absolute disastrous, transliterated Latin Vulgate-to-English flop that was the original Douay-Rheims.
To: FNU LNU
Chaucer died in 1400. The 1611 KJV was basically Shakespearean English, fully familiar to the common Englishman. If you wish to dabble in history try at least to get the dates right.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson