I have never met an atheist that could discuss science at my level. Not one. They seem to be ignorant of science but use their position as an atheist to make the claim that they are smarter than everyone else.
What happens when you debate them?
A lot of atheists claim to be “pro-science” so they can use it as a weapon against religion. But they understand science very little if they think they can use it to disprove the existence of God. The scientific method does not prove or disprove anything. Nor is it ever “settled”, as the manmade climate change proponents often claim. It is an ongoing cyclical method that uses observation and experimentation to support or counter-support a theory. Evidence does not constitute proof, nor does the lack of evidence constitute disproof.