It has NOTHING to do with this thread.
She never even mentioned it in this thread.
It was you who brought it up, which makes it look like you are carrying a debate or argument cross threads.
So would you care to explain to her why you brought up something that she never mentioned and why you are bringing something cross thread?
Sure, I’ll explain:
Pre VC II Church vs. post VC II church; the Mass, the Liturgy, the Bible, the church calendar, the saint factory, ecumenia, etc.
The posted article mentioned the reason for the movement of the Feast of Christ the King in the Church calendar. It was a post-VC II innovation, as were altar chicks, communion on the hoof and in the paw, adultery, the rosary, intercommunion etc.
As a glaring example of hypocrisy, most of the post VC II church now celebrates Ascension Thursday on a Sunday. Makes it easier on those novus ordo priests and parishioners; but a total violation of the Church calendar. The same applies to assigning every other Holy Day of Obligation to the nearest Sunday. The Novus church is a lazy church.