Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/28/2017 11:22:57 AM PDT by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ebb tide

They’re aiming for the heart, but they won’t win.

Pray the rosary.

And don’t stand next to Bergoglio or his minions in a lightning storm.


2 posted on 10/28/2017 11:35:44 AM PDT by pax_et_bonum (Never Forget the SEALs of Extortion 17 - and God Bless The United States of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide
Steve Skojec's site is hugely important - thanks for bringing it to the attention of Freepers.

And read that in conjunction with the British Fr. Hunwicke, who runs through the
"highlights of the Anglican experiment along these lines going back to 1928:

Dear Bishop Roche
3 posted on 10/28/2017 11:37:16 AM PDT by jobim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide
In the question between whether physical 'law' bounds everything or is bound by everything ... if mankind ever answers that incorrectly in great enough numbers, he will destroy himself and the world with it.

This is true as it pertains to the physical World and Human Kind, and also true within any single microscopic time span of any man's or woman's life.

This is why there is a public battle for the World, and also a private battle for a single moment, why heaven is already amongst us, why forgiveness is already an immediate done deal if one arrives at and realizes, once and for all, the correct answer.

To answer fully correctly is to dwell in Heaven for eternity. To answer fully incorrectly is to be trapped in a dream of Hell for a billion years or permanently. To wallow or compromise or flounder or teeter is to inhabit the confusing hypnosis of earth, or 'the world,' a dream not as bad as Hell, but one of unending and various states of suffering none the less.

Have a nice day. :-)

4 posted on 10/28/2017 11:45:40 AM PDT by tinyowl (A is A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

“Transubstantiation is not a dogma, and as an explanation [of the Eucharist] it has its limits. For example, it contradicts metaphysics.” [emphasis added]

So he is discounting the words of Jesus and the Eucharistic miracles. May God have mercy on him.

Catholic Catechism 1376


5 posted on 10/28/2017 12:24:33 PM PDT by ADSUM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

We just say it signifies the blood and body of Jesus

You guys make it literal

It’s your business

No brook


6 posted on 10/28/2017 12:28:20 PM PDT by wardaddy (Virtue signalers should be shot on sight...conservative ones racked and hanged then fed to dogs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

If this is true, then francis has done it. He has broken with the Church. He is not the Church. He cannot destroy it.


7 posted on 10/28/2017 1:02:20 PM PDT by I want the USA back (*slam is a political movement that hides behind the illusion of religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

Ever notice how ecumenicalism seems to come from the people who fancy themselves as being in charge of all of Christendom? funny how that works


8 posted on 10/28/2017 1:21:37 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

I can’t imagine that devout Catholic Christians would accept that transubstantiation is not a core belief of the Catholic Church. This would constitute a serious change in dogma. I think it would shock Catholics as much as or even more than the pedophile crisis a few years back.


9 posted on 10/28/2017 1:49:37 PM PDT by KittyKares (Drain the Swamp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

Things are accelerating rapidly. The apostates and heretics are going hog wild, now.


10 posted on 10/28/2017 2:57:40 PM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide
Of course as I have said before, intercommunion has been happening ever since JPII codified the Second Vatican Council in his 1983 Code of Canon Law.

It is there that we find, for the first time ever, non-Catholics being allowed to receive Catholic communion WITHOUT the requirement to FIRST CONVERT to the Holy Catholic Religion.

These "ecumenical masses" are just the next logical step in the promotion of Vatican II's false Religion of Ecumenism.

14 posted on 10/29/2017 5:41:15 AM PDT by piusv (Pray for a return to the pre-Vatican II (Catholic) Faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson