Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: fwdude
Typical Bible revisionist: "But, wait! MY interpretation is better! Disregard all the information that's been studied, discussed, and passed down for thousands of years. They were all wrong! I once read the Bible, and I didn't see anything bad about queers in it!"

I think Satan has been working overtime in recent years.....

30 posted on 10/04/2017 9:31:41 AM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jeffc

There was a view of Genesis 6 that was prevalent until the time of Augustine. He popularized a Sethite view of Genesis 6 where the text nor anywhere else in the Bible supports it. The sons of God were angels as they are elsewhere in Scripture. Jude verifies this as does 1 Peter.

The angels who kept not their first estate but went after strange flesh were the Genesis 6 angels. Jude then uses “likewise” in relation to Sodom and Gomorrah. Our theological pollution has overshadowed what the text actually says.

Sodom and Gomorrah were evil cities right in the middle of a bunch of Giant tribes just as mentioned in Genesis 6. Their sin is connected to Genesis 6.


41 posted on 10/04/2017 9:48:53 AM PDT by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson