Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Really Happened at Nicea?
Christian Research Institute ^ | June 10, 2009 | James R. White

Posted on 08/11/2017 10:41:52 PM PDT by boatbums

Summary

The Council of Nicea is often misrepresented by cults and other religious movements. The actual concern of the council was clearly and unambiguously the relationship between the Father and the Son. Is Christ a creature, or true God? The council said He was true God. Yet, the opponents of the deity of Christ did not simply give up after the council’s decision. In fact, they almost succeeded in overturning the Nicene affirmation of Christ’s deity. But faithful Christians like Athanasius continued to defend the truth, and in the end, truth triumphed over error.

The conversation intensified quickly. “You can’t really trust the Bible,” my Latter-day Saints acquaintance said, “because you really don’t know what books belong in it. You see, a bunch of men got together and decided the canon of Scripture at the Council of Nicea, picking some books, rejecting others.” A few others were listening in on the conversation at the South Gate of the Mormon Temple in Salt Lake City. It was the LDS General Conference, and I again heard the Council of Nicea presented as that point in history where something “went wrong,” where some group of unnamed, faceless men “decided” for me what I was supposed to believe. I quickly corrected him about Nicea — nothing was decided, or even said, about the canon of Scripture at that council.1

I was reminded how often the phrase “the Council of Nicea” is used as an accusation by those who reject the Christian faith. New Agers often allege that the council removed the teaching of reincarnation from the Bible.2 And of course, Jehovah’s Witnesses and critics of the deity of Christ likewise point to that council as the “beginning of the Trinity” or the “first time the deity of Christ was asserted as orthodox teaching.” Others see it as the beginning of the union of church and state in light of the participation of the Roman Emperor, Constantine. Some even say it was the beginning of the Roman Catholic church.


TOPICS: Apologetics; History
KEYWORDS: creed; nicea; scripture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-259 next last
To: boatbums; Ancesthntr
Excellent study about the Council of Nicea and the critical importance of Sacred Scripture in establishing the major tenets of the Christian faith - specifically the Deity of Jesus Christ.

There is a great wall of doctrine that doubles, triples, quadruples down on the "diety of Christ".

There's even this important Nicene creed that really sticks it to the trinity-deniers. Scripture has been fully weaponized to deal with dissenters, which is a little strange considering that the % of trinity-believers far exceeds that of the "deniers". I suppose it's like big government and its media being hyper-sensitive to any and all competition. Word might get out.

Makes perfect sense in the long-term narrative though. That, along with the pattern of Elijah being whisked up to heaven alive, yet coming back as John the Baptist (for those who would accept it). John even said that he wasn't Elijah. Now if the NT is all true and Jesus made the claim that John was Elijah, then John meant the physical body, whereas Jesus meant the soul. Something like that anyway, so no conflict at all, for those willing to accept it.

The point about Elijah is, that Jesus could be walking around today, mowing his lawn on the weekends, going fishing, working on his car, helping out the neighbors and the community -- you know, just being who he is, even faithfully attending his local church. And nobody would recognize him. If fact, if he believed these doctrines, he wouldn't even recognize himself.

A paradigm shift is a real risk for those who only read the texts through the prism of "unassailable" teachings. The political parallel echo chamber is that Donald Trump should not have been elected president, but there he is. The Establishment has been forced to deal with it, and it isn't coping very well. Masks are dropping because of it.

21 posted on 08/12/2017 7:59:14 AM PDT by Ezekiel (All who mourn(ed!) the destruction of America merit the celebration of her rebirth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

“The creed also contained the “anathema” (i.e., condemnation) for those who rejected these truths, and for the first time, such anathemas carried with them civil repercussions. Arius and some of his followers were banished, even though for a short time. This set a precedent that eventually would have tremendous impact on culture and church, but it is also a separate issue from the theological proclamation of the council.”

There’s a good reason the anathema doesn’t appear in the creed when most post it, it was not in the creed when it was adopted. According to Eusebius, the anathema was not in the copy of the creed he and most bishops signed but was placed in later after the adoption. The thing was that Eusebius and many of the bishops agreed with Arius because that was the teaching they’d received as neophytes in the Church. A council empowered to examine him and his teachings would later admit as much. That was why he was on the eve of being accepted fully back into the church when he was assassinated.

I thought it quite interesting that every time the bishops would come up with a statement in simple biblical term each one was found to support Arianism, which was why they had to “go beyond what is written” (1 Cor. 4:6) to find a way to justify their duality creed. The thing to keep in mind about what led to the council of Nicea is that it was really a power struggle for the office of bishop of Alexandria where most of the people wanted Arius and the aged Bishop Alexander wanted the ambitious Athanasius, his assistant, to get the position. Arius had to go, so Athanasius, who history tells us had no scruples, made it into an issue of teachings with Alexander’s approval. The two were willing to split the Empire so Athanasius could get the position, which was one of the most powerful in Christendom at the time.

As to the Mormon, he was obviously ignorant regarding how the Bible became the Bible. But what more can we expect from somebody who goes beyond the scriptures to find his teachings?


22 posted on 08/12/2017 8:22:32 AM PDT by Dupin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

quote-God established the Sabbath as a SIGN – like a symbol, or an identifying label – a “mark” of IDENTITY between Himself and His people!
He knew if they continually remembered His Sabbath day, it was pivotal to remembering Him as CREATOR – the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
Though the Jews rejected Christ, they have clung tenaciously to the Old Testament scriptures, to the weekly Sabbath, and to the annual Sabbaths.

The Sabbath is a sign.
Problem is, Yosemitest, Jews don’t know when the Sabbath is because they don’t have the Son. So they don’t have the Father. (according to scripture)

Jews follow Rome.
Christianity (even those who worship on Saturday) follow Rome.
not the Father.

Rome changed times but it’s deeper than what you state.

The Father tells times through His Son.
The Word Made Flesh.

And Passover is the 6th Day on the Father’s calendar.
and rome’s ‘Friday’ is not the 6th Day on the Father’s calendar.

Rome changed the 1st importance of the gospel- and changed jesus into a roman- in accordance with their catechism and their calendar.

Jews and Christians would be blessed to know when His Sabbath is.
And it won’t be found using Rome’s calendar.

But it will be used following His Creation, His Word and His Calendar.
and maybe more will see why it is written that the Word Became Flesh.

Today, rome’s saturday, isn’t His Sabbath.
that is rome’s approved sabbath day for jews and some christians..
that would be news to Jews and seventh day adventists and hebrew roots folks.

But some of them already know that Rome changed ‘times and laws’.
They just haven’t gone far enough to question rome’s calendar that the world uses today as ‘gospel’..

amazing to watch the world follow rome to accept a false 1st importance of the gospel-
and a false roman christ that is birthed simply with a roman catechism and calendar.

something His Word can show as false.

Amazing to observe the world accept the enemy’s premise.
blind leading blind.

all for His Glory!


23 posted on 08/12/2017 8:23:27 AM PDT by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Philsworld
Thank you for noticing.

I just wish that more people would read the Bible themselves, and really comprehend what God has told us.
It's not hard to understand.

But the first thing that usually happens to older people who sit down and think about what they've read in the Bible, is ... they quickly learn that most of what they've been taught by Churches ... is not IN the Bible.
Then they get angry, and it takes a while to UN-learn it, and to learn the truth.

It's a beautiful world that's God is bringing to us in the future.
But before it gets here, and we live in REAL PEACE, ... there's a lot of trouble we have to go through; a real fiery trial, which is to try" us all.

Most of these so-called Christians have no comprehension of what is ahead of them, and what THEY will have to do, on the very day that Jesus Christ returns to earth.
If you try to show them, they will deny that Jesus has shown this to them.
Jesus told them that He was also the Lord of the Old Testament too.
2 Chronicles 29:4-11 shows us HOW God will cleanse His temple after his return, and Zechariah 14 shows even more detail about what WE will be doing.

They want to believe in STAYING in the air with Jesus at his second Coming.
And that is where they STOP reading, and they do not absorb what was written right after that. Jesus, at His return, will set foot ON the Earth, and WE shall tread down the wicked. But many say, The "MOTHER OF HARLOTS" has DECEIVED THEM, and taken away the truth from them, just like Jesus described.
24 posted on 08/12/2017 8:52:08 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

My first thought as well


25 posted on 08/12/2017 9:13:44 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: boatbums

It seems to be the hallmark of a cult to tell people that they cannot understand Scripture and therefore need someone (usually them) to *interpret* it correctly for you.


26 posted on 08/12/2017 9:15:12 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: boatbums

It seems to be the hallmark of a cult to tell people that they cannot understand Scripture and therefore need someone (usually them) to *interpret* it correctly for you.

Just believe us, they say, because we’re right.

But if you can’t trust Scripture, then why should we trust them?


27 posted on 08/12/2017 9:15:59 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; boatbums
No need to read beyond that — non-Catholic opinions?

So what?

Are you trying to discredit the message by discrediting the messenger?

Is every non-Catholic wrong by default in your book?

If there is something wrong with the content of the article, how about you address that instead of disparaging or trying to slander, the author?

28 posted on 08/12/2017 9:23:44 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Campion

Heh, but don’t you know that all non-Catholics are wrong by default?

Just because they are not Catholic?


29 posted on 08/12/2017 9:24:37 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: boatbums
They WILL, however, say you can trust the Bible that has been translated "correctly"

Lots of people say that ... consider the "King James Only" folks, or those who vociferously reject the "Notoriously Incorrect Version". I bet there are even published translations that you would reject or recommend against (like, perhaps, the mormon translation ...).

30 posted on 08/12/2017 9:25:12 AM PDT by NorthMountain (The Democrats ... have lost their grip on reality -DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sportutegrl
Link to chapter and verse, IF you can. The "Lord Day" is the "Great and TERRIBLE Day" of the Lord.
Those worshiping on Sunday, HAVE THE MARK OF THE BEAST in their hand (what they do), in their head (what they think, and in their heart (what they love).

My friend has detailed the proof as follows: The resurrection was NOT on Sunday, and neither is "The LORD''s Day".
31 posted on 08/12/2017 9:44:37 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: delchiante
But the "Jews" DO KNOW the Sabbath, and the SabbathS (Plural) .
Don't forget about the HARD lesson they learned in "the wilderness".
32 posted on 08/12/2017 9:56:07 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Campion

WRONG !


33 posted on 08/12/2017 9:56:52 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

quote-But the “Jews” DO KNOW the Sabbath, and the SabbathS (Plural) .
Don’t forget about the HARD lesson they learned in “the wilderness”.

The wilderness is still ongoing, Yosemitest. This time for Spiritual Israel. And nobody has reached the Promised Land. They’ve all died in the wilderness before reaching the promise of eternal life.

Not unlike Physical Israel. first the natural, then the spiritual.

The Lamb laid His life down on Passover, delivering people from the bondage of sin, about 2,000 years ago.

And after being delivered by the blood of the lamb, about 2,000 years ago, the world has seen about about ‘40 years’ of jubilees (40 x 50= about 2000 years)- some would say scripture hints of ‘about 2,000 swine’ years in the New Testament.

Jews wouldn’t know His Sabbath today because they don’t believe the Lamb died for their sins, in accordance with the scriptures.
Frankly, they haven’t been fully introduced to the Word Made Flesh.

They don’t see the Word Made Flesh at Passover- they see Moses and another lamb.
Christianity doesn’t see the Word Made Flesh at Passover either.
But He’s there and they should because that pattern of Egypt and the wilderness, is replaying itself. Just on a spiritual level.

Btw, you mentioned the wilderness and Sabbath-
the first ‘Sabbath’in the wilderness occured after they were in the wilderness for 30 days.

It occured on the 22nd Day of His 2nd month, according to scripture.
That is a pattern the Father was teaching them- They do not follow that pattern today.. they follow rome.

And, it was not an accident the Word Made Flesh mentioned 30 in one of His Parables. or 60 or 100. also something Jews don’t follow today. (but neither do their Christian brothers and sisters)

The spiritual wilderness has been going on this very day. And Spiritual Israel, if we accept your premise, is in for a hard lesson. a humbling one.

Nothing new under the sun. That which was, is that which will be.

Most don’t know they are wandering in a wilderness.. But that is the beauty of His patterns.

first the natural. then the spiritual.

Jews don’t realize His 7th Day Sabbath is the day the Messsiah laid in the tomb, resting from His work- the 15th Day. (the day after Passover- not the day after rome’s ‘Friday’)
And rose the 16th day. (3rd day from Passover- not the 3rd day from rome’s friday)

The 16th day His 1st month (First Fruits) is the same ‘day’ as the 16th Day of His 2nd month(and every of His months)- that 16th day of the 2nd month is when manna from heaven came in the wilderness.
and came for 6 days.

16,17,18,19,20,21
22nd day - 7th Day Sabbath.

May be the ultimate reason why there are 22 letters in the Hebrew language.

again, patterns He was teaching physical Israel.

Jews would be blessed to understand that.
Christianity would be blessed to understand that too.
Spiritual Israel would be blessed to understand that too.

Inherited lies have blinded people from Truth.


34 posted on 08/12/2017 10:45:33 AM PDT by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MosesKnows

So, why did Christ create a church? If you read the New Testament, you should know how much is dedicated to the church, including taking problems of faith among members to the CHURCH.

It is pretty unbelievably arrogant to assume that people studying teachings and scriptures for 2000 years are wrong, but I am right and the doctrine being taught is unsound!

Organized churches are the biggest problem facing Christianity. Probably the most ignorant statement regarding religion ever written. Let me know where you find that in the New Testament


35 posted on 08/12/2017 11:34:51 AM PDT by nobamanomore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: boatbums

**- specifically the Deity of Jesus Christ.**

Deity is not of Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ is of Deity,......the only true God. That’s why Jesus Christ and his apostles always used the phrase “the Son of God”.

Simply put: where is the Father NOT at?


36 posted on 08/12/2017 12:05:51 PM PDT by Zuriel (Acts 2:38,39....Do you believe it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delchiante
Thanks.
You reminded me of something I read many years ago, but that had slipped my mind.

Reference "Rome changed times but it’s deeper than what you state." :
Here's more on the "Calendar" Here's another source with similar Diagram:
Now back to the first source article. Here's another second source Diagram showing the chart: Now we go back to the original article: Thanks "delchiante", for the reminder about the CHANGE TO THE CALENDAR .
37 posted on 08/12/2017 12:32:38 PM PDT by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: delchiante
Most of what you wrote, I agree on.
BUT ...

But the "Jews" DO KNOW the Sabbath, and the SabbathS (Plural) .
Don't forget about the HARD lesson they learned in "the wilderness".
God BURNED IT into their actions (hand), thinking (forehead), and into what they love (heart).

Ponder Romans 3:1-3; Hebrews 5:11-13 ; and 1 Peter 4:10-12 .
38 posted on 08/12/2017 12:48:36 PM PDT by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Proof by blatant assertion?


39 posted on 08/12/2017 12:51:26 PM PDT by Campion (Halten Sie sich unbedingt an die Lehre!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: metmom
It seems to be the hallmark of a cult to tell people that they cannot understand Scripture and therefore need someone (usually them) to *interpret* it correctly for you.

It's the hallmark of a cult to say "Everyone else *got it wrong* for (centuries, millenia, etc.) until *we* came along to finally tell you the *truth* that wicked, naughty men -- who were stronger than Christ's promise to protect His Bride through the power of the Holy Spirit -- to finally tell you the truth that *they* have been hiding from you all these years."

40 posted on 08/12/2017 12:55:30 PM PDT by Campion (Halten Sie sich unbedingt an die Lehre!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-259 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson