Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why no Christian should attend a "gay wedding"
LifeSiteNews ^ | 7-31-17 | Lifesitenews.com

Posted on 07/31/2017 7:06:58 PM PDT by ReformationFan

July 31, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) — This article is intended for anyone contemplating buckling under to the pressure of the radical homosexual agenda by either participating as a vendor (e.g. wedding cake baker, florist, photographer) or as an attendee at a same-sex "marriage" ceremony. From the vantage point of Holy Scripture, this is a no brainer. Multiple books in both the Old and New Testaments condemn homosexual behavior as gravely sinful.

Even more to the point, the Bible is very clear that true marriage is a sacred union between one man and one woman. This begins with Genesis in which man and woman are together created in the image and likeness of God (Genesis 1:27). The Old Testament goes on to liken the relationship between God and Israel to the relationship between a husband and wife (Isaiah 62:5). And the New Testament analogizes the relationship between Christ and His Church to the relationship between a husband and wife (2 Corinthians 11:2).

Our Lord began his public ministry by performing a miracle at the wedding feast of Cana (John 2:1-12). And He was clear in affirming that marriage is the union of a man and a woman (Ephesians 5:31). Since homosexuality is considered a grave sin and marriage a sacred union, the concept of same-sex marriage is a sacrilege. It seeks to profane that which is holy. When a same-sex couple stands before someone acting in an official capacity and repeats words that mimic marriage vows, they are, in a very real sense, openly defying God. Their alleged public profession of their "marital" relationship is the equivalent of their publicly shaking their fist at God. And, all those present are, in effect, cheering them on in their act of sacrilege.

Based on the foregoing, all authentic Christians are called to stand up for the Truth of marriage. In doing so, they will be standing up for our Lord who is the Way, the Truth and the Life (John 14:6). Our Lord has promised that He will acknowledge before His Father those who stand up for Him, but not acknowledge those that deny Him (Matthew 10:32). Those that neither know or love our Lord will not understand this message because they are in darkness. Those that know and love our Lord will understand and heed this message because they are in the light. The darkness will not overcome the light (John 1:5).

One can call themselves a supporter of same-sex "marriage. And one can call themselves a Christian. But one cannot honestly call themselves both. This issue has caused, and will continue to cause, much conflict and consternation in our society. This is exactly what our Lord was talking about when He said that He came to bring not peace but division (Luke 12:51). The lines have never been more clearly drawn. There is no middle ground. The only question for anyone who calls themselves a "Christian" is on which side of the divide they will rise or fall.


TOPICS: Catholic; Evangelical Christian; Mainline Protestant; Moral Issues; Orthodox Christian; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: catholic; christians; homosexualagenda; moralabsolutes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-162 next last
To: NorthMountain

Twisting my words, stance and attitude is not Christian.

No where hereon have I suggested accepting sodomy etc. And, if I thought a couple believed I was condoning sin—hetero or homo—I’d likely avoid their wedding.


101 posted on 08/01/2017 9:33:24 AM PDT by JockoManning (Listen Online http://www.klove.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan
NO you shouldn't attend!

Don't be mean or cruel, but you're responsible for you. You have to draw the line.

I had a family member that was confused a couple years ago and thought she was a lesbian. I set down some rules for my home. I wasn't self righteous or mean about it; just here's the rules. And they were non-negotiable.

1. Your "partner" may never enter my home. I had young children. I didn't want them thinking that any part of that sexual sin was acceptable and was absolutely not welcome in our home. Plus, I just knew there would be some show of "affection", which would cause a scene. So I decided to nip that in the bud.
2. This family member was not allowed to be alone with our children.
3. This family member was not allowed to talk about their "relationship" in our home.

Active homosexual behavior is seriously deviant and no part of it is welcome in my home. However, we never gave up on this person. After a couple years, she turned herself around, met a nice man, and has been married to him for 10yrs now.

You should not support homosexual behavior in any form. It's an abomination to God. Why would anyone support a loved ones actions that will get them cast out at the last day???

Matt 10
35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

36 And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household.

37 He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.

All followers of Jesus Christ are commanded to take a stand against such things.
102 posted on 08/01/2017 9:35:46 AM PDT by StormPrepper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JockoManning
I don’t celebrate parading of any sin

So let's cut to the chase. Your friends Adam and Steve, who like to commit sodomy with each other, have decided to "get married". They invited you to the "wedding".

Do you attend? Ever? Under any circumstances?

103 posted on 08/01/2017 9:36:44 AM PDT by NorthMountain (The Democrats ... have lost their grip on reality -DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: metmom
It's ridiculous to identify as our sin, which is what homosexuals do. To make our sin our identity is never going to end well.

I completely agree. Satan identifies us by our sins. God identifies us by name. There's a difference, I think you'll agree.

You may have missed the sarcasm in my remark to which you replied.

104 posted on 08/01/2017 9:38:41 AM PDT by NorthMountain (The Democrats ... have lost their grip on reality -DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Sin is sin and participating in or attending a homosexual *wedding* shows that you condone it.

There ya go!
105 posted on 08/01/2017 9:39:18 AM PDT by StormPrepper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: JockoManning
if I thought a couple believed I was condoning sin—hetero or homo—I’d likely avoid their wedding.

To attend a wedding is to give approval to it. Any claim otherwise is silly.

To attend a particular "gay" "wedding" is to approve of the very idea of "gay" "weddings" as well as to approve this particular "gay" "wedding". "Gay" "weddings" are inherently celebrations of a sin which God has called an abomination. I suggest that a Christian should be more certain about such inherently evil events than to say merely that he'd "likely avoid them".

106 posted on 08/01/2017 9:43:14 AM PDT by NorthMountain (The Democrats ... have lost their grip on reality -DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

“Satan knows your name but calls you by your sin
God knows your sin but calls you by your name.”


107 posted on 08/01/2017 9:49:19 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain
It's ridiculous to identify as our sin, which is what homosexuals do. To make our sin our identity is never going to end well.

I completely agree. Satan identifies us by our sins. God identifies us by name. There's a difference, I think you'll agree.


That's a great comment and I'm going to remember it. =)
108 posted on 08/01/2017 9:50:24 AM PDT by StormPrepper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: JockoManning
And, if I thought a couple believed I was condoning sin—hetero or homo—I’d likely avoid their wedding.

For one thing, going to their wedding IS showing you condone it. You give your approval of it by attending.

And it's not just about whether the couple thinks you are condoning it by attending. There are others who are watching and when they see you going, it tells them too that you condone it.

109 posted on 08/01/2017 9:51:23 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

I’d have to ask The Lord. I could imagine a situation where I might.

= = = =

Your turn.

Christ railed against pride and pharisee-ism FAR MORE than the whole Bible rails against homosexuality. God’s relative priority against both seems clear from the amount of text time given to each.

Why have you failed to rail against those sins in the Church AS MUCH AS you rail against homosexuality. Yeah, I’m assuming. However, given your statements hereon, it’s a safe bet.


110 posted on 08/01/2017 9:56:52 AM PDT by JockoManning (Listen Online http://www.klove.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: JockoManning; PK2U; metmom; StormPrepper; NorthMountain; Magnum44; CodeToad; YouGoTexasGirl; ...
"Some scholars insist that
[Ephesians 5:11, And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.]
refers to former Christians who have deliberately gone way
and persistently over the line into overt and rebellious apostasy."

Romans 1:27-28
And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman,
burned in their lust one toward another;
men with men working that which is unseemly,
and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error
which was meet.

And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge,
God gave them over to a reprobate mind,
to do those things which are not convenient

111 posted on 08/01/2017 10:09:48 AM PDT by Bodleian_Girl (Don't check the news, check Cernovich on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: StormPrepper

Seriously? Polygamy was part of the laws? Please give me verses for THAT one.


112 posted on 08/01/2017 10:37:38 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: StormPrepper

Seriously? Polygamy was part of the laws? Please give me verses for THAT one.


113 posted on 08/01/2017 10:38:57 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan; newgeezer

It would be hateful for a Christian to attend a gay wedding. It would be hateful for a Christian to fail to give testimony to what the Lord thinks of such an abomination.


114 posted on 08/01/2017 10:41:49 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (How many ways do liberals hate the bible?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JockoManning

You are assuming i believe that wearing white means something to me personally as a hetro person?
I said before marriage was redefined by a overreaching Federal government that all “marriage”, with State involvement, should be declared a Civil Union.
Homo, hetro and whatever would be a Civil Union.
Problem solved.
That way noone is perceived to be discriminated against.
But the big government/globalist/fascist type folks are not about truly solving the problems.


115 posted on 08/01/2017 10:42:17 AM PDT by Leep (Less talk more ACTiON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: JockoManning
I’d have to ask The Lord. I could imagine a situation where I might.

I see. There are circumstances under which you condone sodomy. I figured as much.

Christ railed against pride and pharisee-ism FAR MORE than the whole Bible rails against homosexuality.

That is your interpretation of Scripture. I find it ... lacking. I also find your willingness to judge other people for "Pharisee-ism", but to excuse different other people for sodomy to be completely irrational. Unless, of course, you don't think sodomy is a big deal.

Yeah, I’m assuming.

Yes, you are. With the usual result.

116 posted on 08/01/2017 10:49:04 AM PDT by NorthMountain (The Democrats ... have lost their grip on reality -DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

One can call themselves a supporter of same-sex “marriage. And one can call themselves a Christian. But one cannot honestly call themselves both. This issue has caused, and will continue to cause, much conflict and consternation in our society. This is exactly what our Lord was talking about when He said that He came to bring not peace but division (Luke 12:51). The lines have never been more clearly drawn. There is no middle ground. The only question for anyone who calls themselves a “Christian” is on which side of the divide they will rise or fall.


Exactly.


117 posted on 08/01/2017 12:08:23 PM PDT by ravenwolf (If the Bible does not say it in plain words, please don`t preach it to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

if I thought a couple believed I was condoning sin—hetero or homo—I’d likely avoid their wedding.


Why would`nt they believe that? and so would i or anyone else.

i Cor 5:11
But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.

Even one called a brother, that certainly includes unbelievers.

There are other versions which say it a little different which takes in about every thing.


118 posted on 08/01/2017 12:23:39 PM PDT by ravenwolf (If the Bible does not say it in plain words, please don`t preach it to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

if I thought a couple believed I was condoning sin—hetero or homo—I’d likely avoid their wedding.


Why would`nt they believe that? and so would i or anyone else.

i Cor 5:11
But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.

Even one called a brother, that certainly includes unbelievers.

There are other versions which say it a little different which takes in about every thing.


119 posted on 08/01/2017 12:23:59 PM PDT by ravenwolf (If the Bible does not say it in plain words, please don`t preach it to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge,
God gave them over to a reprobate mind,


Good Job.


120 posted on 08/01/2017 12:27:15 PM PDT by ravenwolf (If the Bible does not say it in plain words, please don`t preach it to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson