Proving yet again, it is the Romam Catholic, and in this case a priest, who is usually the first to get personal and/or resort to profanity when the argument goes against them.
Again, you flatter yourself that you present “argument.”
You snipe, you erect straw men, you draw invidious, preposterous conclusions. You do not ask sincere questions.
You are profoundly intellectually dishonest. Which I can prove, and have proven many times before.
Is the following syllogism formally valid or invalid? (If you answer with anything but the single word “yes,” you are intellectually dishonest. [See? I’ve even sneaked you the answer.])
—Sally is the mother of Sam.
—Sam is a welder.
—Sally is the mother of a welder.