What do you mean "judge"? Privately judge? Or judge juridically? Because I'll be the first to admit I have no authority to judge juridically in the matter. If Bergoglio is to be judged juridically it is only by a reigning Pope through a Council: Honorius I was anathematized precisely under those conditions.
Manning was a papal maximalist. He is not the ne plus ultra of papal theory. There are plenty of contrary examples, going from St. Paul rebuking Peter, to St. Catherine of Siena, to the Counter-Reformation speculations on how a Pope could lose his office due to heresy.
And that even if you can disagree, you are not to engage in public dissent regarding it.
See post 233 .
Do you instead affirm ascertaining the veracity of anything that is taught by examination of the warrant for it from your chosen authoritative documents?