Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Pilgrim's Progress

Your comment is a non sequitur.

Luke 1, which comes before Luke 2 (funny that), clearly makes the case for the virgin birth. If your believe the virgin birth can be denied by replacing “Joseph and His mother Mary” with “parents” after the declarations in Luke 1, well, I really don’t what to say to you.


83 posted on 06/28/2017 2:37:21 PM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: kosciusko51

So, how many professors that deny the virgin birth are holding a King James Bible in their hand?

I’m certainly not saying that a person can’t believe a doctrine if he uses another version - but the chances are great that the person that is not acquainted with the doctrine is not likely going to find it in a Bible that changes ‘virgin’ with ‘young woman.’


85 posted on 06/28/2017 2:43:50 PM PDT by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

To: kosciusko51
Luke 1, which comes before Luke 2 (funny that), clearly makes the case for the virgin birth.

Pay no attention to the page you read just a minute earlier!

Yes, they really think you are that stupid.

96 posted on 06/28/2017 7:11:16 PM PDT by RansomOttawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson