It's not that I was defending Luther, but more that I was criticizing the less-than well founded attacks upon the man.
Obviously, I'd need to spoon-feed fuller explanations to you, yet you've not addressed repeated queries posed to you that you would be willing (or not) to read information at links provided.
Instead, you were dismissive, leading me to think you didn't even bother reading what was there -- although I am supposed to go buy a book from Amazon.com, and read through the whole thing in search of some unspecified alleged quote (among a few you have posted) that you've not specifically indicated was in that one book, much less WHERE it could be found if it was in that book.
No, that's not how this works. You're fooling with the wrong guy.
How can you you disprove my quotes of Luther if you willingly refuse to read his own works?
I spoon feed you Luther.
You spoon feed me nothing but third party quotes.
Do you realize you have not once quoted your own arch-heretic on this thread in his defense? Just smoke and mirrors.
It’s obvious to me that you don’t know squat about Luther nor his evil works.
Everyone of your links were to the same numskulls' website, which I have already been very aware of. I quote Luther; you link to numskulls.