Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana

It would seem that this is likely not about Mary being a virgin when Jesus was born but about the tradition that she remained so forever afterwards.

The latter is merely a tradition unsupported by Scripture. As is the belief that she was somehow born without sin herself (which only puts any perceived issues with Mary having a normal human nature off on her own mother, never mind cutting her own familial ties with the different guys, from Abraham on, who had expressly been given the promise that their seed was the one who was promised).


15 posted on 02/02/2017 9:06:35 AM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rurudyne

That is how I read it also.


25 posted on 02/02/2017 9:11:06 AM PST by dangerdoc ((this space for rent))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Rurudyne
which only puts any perceived issues with Mary having a normal human nature off on her own mother, never mind cutting her own familial ties with the different guys, from Abraham on, who had expressly been given the promise that their seed was the one who was promised

That comment makes no sense at all. Mary wasn't the product of a virgin birth.

29 posted on 02/02/2017 9:12:58 AM PST by Campion (Halten Sie sich unbedingt an die Lehre!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson