This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 02/02/2017 9:42:30 PM PST by Jim Robinson, reason:
childishness |
Posted on 02/01/2017 6:49:28 PM PST by ebb tide
In another in a long stream of apparent attacks on his critics, Pope Francis gave a homily last week accusing Christians who avoid taking risks out of concern for the Ten Commandments as suffering from cowardliness, warning that such people become paralyzed and unable to go forward.
Not taking risks, please, no... prudence...Obeying all the commandments, all of them...,' the pope said, characterizing the thinking of such Christians. Yes, its true, but this paralyzes you too, it makes you forget so many graces received, it takes away memory, it takes away hope, because it doesnt allow you to go forward.
Such people become confined souls who suffer from the sin of cowardice, the pope added. And the presen[ce] of a Christian, of such a Christian, is like when one goes along the street and an unexpected rain comes, and the garment is not so good and the fabric shrinks...Confined souls...This is cowardliness: this is the sin against memory, courage, patience, and hope.
The remarks were made during a homily delivered on January 27th during a mass he was celebrating in Casa Santa Marta, a hotel for pilgrims situated inside of Vatican City where he currently resides. A translation was provided by both Rome Reports and Vatican Radio (the Rome Reports translation is quoted above).
The translation published by Vatican Radio rendered the Italian word pusillanimità (similar to the English word pusillanimity) as faintheartedness. However, Italian-English dictionaries translate the word pusillanime and pusillanimità as cowardly and cowardice. The pope used the word twice during his homily.
The popes remarks appeared to be directed against those who criticize him for using Amoris Laetitia to permit those who are living in adulterous second marriages to receive Holy Communion at the discretion of their priest. The practice contradicts the Churchs Code of Canon Law, as well as its perennial tradition of prohibiting the sacraments to those who are living in public mortal sin.
In particular, Athanasius Schneider, auxiliary bishop of Astana, Kazakhstan, recently decried those clerics who wish to give Holy Communion to remarried Catholics living in adultery. He labeled them Aaronic priests who enable their flock to sin against the Ten Commandments, like the High Priest Aaron in the Book of Exodus, who built a golden calf to allow the Israelites to violate the first commandment.
In a thinly-veiled critique of Pope Francis Amoris Laetitia, delivered at the Lepanto Foundation in Rome, Schneider warned: This first clerical sin is repeating itself today in the life of the Church. He added, Instead of the First Commandment, as it was in the time of Aaron, many clerics, even at the highest levels, substitute in our day, for the Sixth Commandment, the new idol of sexual relations between people who are not validly married, which is, in a certain sense, the Golden Calf venerated by the clerics of our day.
The popes statements are the latest in a volley of barbs apparently aimed at critics of Amoris Laetitia in recent weeks.
In late December, addressing the issue of resistance to his attempted reforms, Francis decried malicious resistance that takes refuge in traditions, appearances, formalities, in the familiar, or else in a desire to make everything personal, failing to distinguish between the act, the actor, and the action. The last reference seems to be to those who object to his insinuation in Amoris Laetitia that those civilly remarried and living in an adulterous relationship are not guilty of a sin if they commit it with the intention of maintaining unity for the sake of children, or if they fear they might fall into another sin.
On January 20 Francis complained in a homily about lazy Christians, Christians, who do not have the will to continue, Christians, who do not struggle for a change of things, for new things to come, those that if changed would be a good for everybody. He made an apparent comparison of his critics to the doctors of the law who persecuted Jesus, observing that these men did everything prescribed by the law. But their mindset was distanced from God. Theirs was an egotistical mindset, focused on themselves: their hearts constantly condemned [others].
You should obey the forum rules. That’s all.
I see lots of non-Catholics on this thread.
Not just Lutherans. Many evangelicals believe the anti-Christ will come from Rome.
One day I may return, but certainly not while this fake Pope is in office.
This thread is not a Catholic Caucus thread.
You have been posting your nonsense on Catholic Caucus threads, however.
Why do you do so?
I guess I didn’t know I was an apostate and faced beheading for posting.
I never mentioned beheading; I’m just asking to refrain from posting on Catholic Caucus threads, per the rules of the administrators of this forum.
Can you not do that?
I will never darken your door again.
I highly doubt that.
If your name is on the header of the thread, I won’t be there.
How about a “Catholic Caucus” thread posted by others?
Will you “be there”?
Sorry buddy. Not listening to your whining any more until next time. I don’t listen to the religious version of Hillary Clinton anyways.
In before your NO U!
But worry not! You’ll have the chance to wet yourself in front of the entire board again. Next time you deliberately spread falsehoods, I’ll be around to call you out again!
I'm flattered; I have a heretic stalker!
Sorry Hillary. Didn’t read a word of your reply. My responses now are solely out of morbid curiosity to see how desperate you are to get the last word and give some meaning to your sad, pathetic life.
One response so far.
TWO! Two unread attempts in Papist!Hillary’s sad, desperate attempt to give meaning to her life! Ah ha ha ha!
Are you on drugs?
That didn't last long, did it? Are you that faithful in your marriage?
Let me start you off:
I look upon God no better than a scoundrel (ref. Weimar, Vol. 1, Pg. 487. Cf. Table Talk, No. 963).
Christ committed adultery first of all with the women at the well about whom St. John tells us. Was not everybody about Him saying: Whatever has He been doing with her? Secondly, with Mary Magdalen, and thirdly with the women taken in adultery whom He dismissed so lightly. Thus even, Christ who was so righteous, must have been guilty of fornication before He died. (ref. Trishreden, Weimer Edition, Vol. 2, Pg. 107. What a great blasphemy from a man who is regarded as great reformer!).
I have greater confidence in my wife and my pupils than I have in Christ (ref. Table Talk, 2397b).
Three, four, five unread rants from Papist!Hillary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.