Your reading comprehension and attention seem askew. Try going back and reading the post from which you pulled the sentence you're trying to use in twisted fashion. You will actually see to what source the sentence is appointed. But that was a good try to twist the words of the freeper. You just failed because some folks are actually paying closer attention in order to extend their knowledge base since their minds are not infected with your ism.
I think I must disagree with you here, MGH.
It appears to me af_vet_1981 could be (most likely is, as far as I can tell, at this point) correct in this.
"Spittled off into lala land" was not fair.
Please bear with me, if you will. Though this be something of a diversionary sidebar sort of thing, after some investigation of my own (once I could figure out what exactly was being disputed) results I obtained (which would take more than one link to explain & demonstrate -- in other words, to prove) indicated to me that the question posed to daniel1212;
for that one item of daniel1212's assertion, then, in context of af_vet_1981's following efforts towards disputation, was not unreasonable.
I was left wondering though...why first the diversion to thinking daniel1212 was citing 'Catholic Encyclopedia'??? And then later, in this comment #497 something of a bald assertion;
The link could be said to support that, but the assertion still came across as "bald" (despite the link) for there was no further effort to more clearly point out just precisely how, and why that link could support the assertion
One does wonder though --- how about most of the remainder of daniel1212's info? Must be accurate enough, just maybe?
Try going back and reading the post from which you pulled the sentence you're trying to use in twisted fashion. You will actually see to what source the sentence is appointed
Actually this time i think that was a sincere question and one that i am glad was asked (see reply ), for i want to be accurate. I also should have formatted the reply, as i usually do, to distinguish btwn what a source said and my own findings. If i could correct that statement in past posts then i would do, which one thing i wish this forum enabled.