What makes this comprehend-able and bearable is understanding that we are witnessing a battle between two apostates: Burke vs. Bergoglio.
That being so based on the premise that the “Vatican II Council” and the “Novus Ordo” are works of apostacy, indicting each significant party, as in, for example all the “popes” from “John XXIII” thru the present as well as all those who claim them.
Pope Pius XII is the most recent valid pope. Thus a faithful Catholic seeks priests who practice the faith as it was up through his pontificate, and “Yes, they do exist.”
I don't think this makes it bearable because it gives otherwise faithful Catholics the impression that one is Catholic and one is not. It continues to give legitimacy to the Vatican II revolution. Until Burke recognizes that he is part of the problem in not condemning Vatican II and convert to the Catholic Faith, this will go nowhere.
I mean all of these so-called Catholic prelates who wrote the Dubia had NO problem with Vatican II nor its codification in the New Canon Law by JPII in 1983. The New Canon Law very clearly allows non-Catholics to receive communion when in the past they could not receive communion UNTIL THEY CONVERTED. Where were they then?? Why is the Sixth Commandment more important than the First?