I have not read all 250 pages but it seems the only real issue is communion to divorced couples, right? On SSA, SSM, abortion etc he is on the traditional side or am I missing something else.
It has deeper implications. Are those living in the state of mortal sin eligible to receive communion? (Paul warned about this)
But the real question is back story: It implies sexual sin is not really sin, and it suggest communion is not the Holy Body and Blood of Jess, but a feel good symbol for anyone who wants it.
and it goes even deeper to the idea that morality is relative: Is there right and wrong, good and evil, or is everything “Grey”... the bishops asked him to clarify this problem.