However, his colloquy on the Mass in 1522 was most significant, since this is what turned him against the Mass, whereby he would never offer Mass again. On that occasion, the devil in a "grave and strong voice" persuaded Luther that he had committed "idolatry" for fifteen years by adoring, and causing others to adore "naked bread and wine."
This guy is here to destroy my Church. Get rid of him.
Understand. I am not defending Luther with what I post.
I post only for purpose so the reader will have context...something roman catholics seem to ignore.
Christ committed adultery first of all with the woman at the well about whom St. John tells us. Was not everybody about Him saying: Whatever has he been doing with her? Secondly, with Mary Magdalene , and thirdly with the woman taken in adultery whom he dismissed so lightly. Thus even Christ, who was so righteous, must have been guilty of fornication before He died. ( Table Talk , Weimar edition, vol. 2., no. 1472, April 7 - May 1, 1532; Wiener, p. 3 3).
http://www.mostholytrinityseminary.org/Martin%20Luther%20Quotes.pdf
f you run across a Roman Catholic citing these words against Luther (or any obscure comments from Luther's Table Talk) I commend to you also these words by Roman Catholic Scholar Thomas OMeara:
Catholics are using inaccurately rhetorical arguments when they make the value of Luthers theology and reform depend upon his table-talk language. Rhetoric appeals to the mind- but it appeals through emotions. It reaches the mind not through a purely intellectual act, examining the case thoroughly and logically, but by leaps and bounds, driven by emotions and will, faculties incapable of a calm judgment of what is true [Thomas OMeara, Mary in Protestant and Catholic Theology, (New York: Sheed and Ward, 1966), 5].
http://beggarsallreformation.blogspot.com/2005/12/luther-said-christ-committed-adultery.html
The title of this article proves the globalist theology of the Pope in action.
This means there is an effort underway that attempts to make the Catholic Church no longer a “peculiar people, a holy nation”.
Vatican II was a disaster, and just the same way as the condition of our government the Church is infiltrated with her enemies, who are protestant to every living thing the Church treasures for centuries.
Catholic identity is in the cross hairs. But, for the remnant, who are kept starved as neglected lambs, with neither a Shepherd, nor a Mother— both having been run off by the otherwise tickled ears of the flock, who came before them.
The “Protestant” offshoots are all finely chopped up among themselves, each having their own version of a “pope” running them, or else himself being run over, by the singular interpretation of any man sitting on this or that “busy committee”.
Nothing surprises me. I am compelled to pray and groan and attempt to remain always in a state of grace, given the times, through the Blessed Sacraments.
I am glad to be reminded of this anniversary.
I believe both men (the Pope and Luther), at that time, had issues.
The world is demonstrably better off before God with the Protestant Reformation.
Wow, what a crackpot article. Here’s what Luther ACTUALLY wrote, the material conveniently omitted by the elipsis included:
“If you are a preacher of mercy, do not preach an imaginary but the true mercy. If the mercy is true, you must therefore bear the true, not an imaginary sin. God does not save those who are only imaginary sinners. Be a sinner, and let your sins be strong [or sin boldly], but let your trust in Christ be stronger, and rejoice in Christ who is the victor over sin, death, and the world. We will commit sins while we are here, for this life is not a place where justice resides. We, however, says Peter (2. Peter 3:13) are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth where justice will reign. It suffices that through Gods glory we have recognized the Lamb who takes away the sin of the world. No sin can separate us from Him, even if we were to kill or commit adultery thousands of times each day. Do you think such an exalted Lamb paid merely a small price with a meager sacrifice for our sins? Pray hard for you are quite a sinner.”
And all this about hating the mass? Well, that’s bigly at odds with what is the actual result...
“
1] Falsely are our churches accused of abolishing the Mass; for the Mass is retained among 2] us, and celebrated with the highest reverence. Nearly all the usual ceremonies are also preserved, save that the parts sung in Latin are interspersed here and there with German hymns, which have been added 3] to teach the people. For ceremonies are needed to this end alone that the unlearned 4] be taught [what they need to know of Christ]. And not only has Paul commanded to use in the church a language understood by the people 1 Cor. 14:2-9, but it has also been so ordained by man’s law. 5] The people are accustomed to partake of the Sacrament together, if any be fit for it, and this also increases the reverence and devotion of public 6] worship. For none are admitted 7] except they be first examined. The people are also advised concerning the dignity and use of the Sacrament, how great consolation it brings anxious consciences, that they may learn to believe God, and to expect and ask of Him all that is good. 8] [In this connection they are also instructed regarding other and false teachings on the Sacrament.] This worship pleases God; such use of the Sacrament nourishes true devotion 9] toward God. It does not, therefore, appear that the Mass is more devoutly celebrated among our adversaries than among us.”
http://bookofconcord.org/augsburgconfession.php#article24
Well now that doesn’t sound like someone who hates the Mass, does it? (Yes, I know, this wasn’t actually written by Luther, but by Melanchton, but I think the point still stands...) So why did he have such a problem with the Mass as it was being done? Well that’s nicely explained too...
“10] But it is evident that for a long time this also has been the public and most grievous complaint of all good men that Masses have been basely profaned and applied to purposes of lucre. 11] For it is not unknown how far this abuse obtains in all the churches by what manner of men Masses are said only for fees or stipends, and how many celebrate them contrary to the Canons. 12] But Paul severely threatens those who deal unworthily with the Eucharist when he says, 1 Cor. 11:27: Whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. 13] When, therefore our priests were admonished concerning this sin, Private Masses were discontinued among us, as scarcely any Private Masses were celebrated except for lucre’s sake.
14] Neither were the bishops ignorant of these abuses, and if they had corrected them in time, there would now be less dissension. Heretofore, 15] by their own connivance, they suffered many corruptions to creep into the Church. Now, when it is too late, they begin to complain 16] of the troubles of the Church, while this disturbance has been occasioned simply by those abuses which were so manifest that they could be borne no longer. There have been great 17] dissensions concerning the Mass, concerning the Sacrament. 18] Perhaps the world is being punished for such long-continued profanations of the Mass as have been tolerated in the churches for so many centuries by the very men who 19] were both able and in duty bound to correct them. For in the Ten Commandments it is written, Ex. 20:7: The Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh His name in vain. But since 20] the world began, nothing that God ever ordained seems to have been so abused for filthy lucre as the Mass.
21] There was also added the opinion which infinitely increased Private Masses, namely that Christ, by His passion, had made satisfaction for original sin, and instituted the Mass wherein an offering should be made for daily sins, 22] venial and mortal. From this has arisen the common opinion that the Mass 23] takes away the sins of the living and the dead by the outward act. Then they began to dispute whether one Mass said for many were worth as much as special Masses for individuals, and this brought forth that infinite multitude of Masses. [With this work men wished to obtain from God all that they needed, and in the mean time faith in Christ and the true worship were forgotten.]”
Sounds like a lot of Catholics on this forum.