Because she has all the power.
She says "yes" or "no" to the sex act, by law.
She gets has the entire term of the pregnancy to decide if she wants to become a parent. He is expected to make that decision before the sex act even occurs.
She gets to unilaterally obligate him to financial support for the child, again by law, if she decides to keep the baby while he has absolutely no legal influence on that decision.
Absolutely not.
The guy can act like a man and show some respect to the girl by NOT insisting she compromise her morals OR HE can say *No* too, is she's the one pushing for it.
She gets has the entire term of the pregnancy to decide if she wants to become a parent. He is expected to make that decision before the sex act even occurs.
Yes, and instead of showing the restraint of a male dog near a female in heat, he can decide beforehand to keep himself pure as well.
She gets to unilaterally obligate him to financial support for the child, again by law, if she decides to keep the baby while he has absolutely no legal influence on that decision.
So now you're pushing abortion?
You know what?
He IS responsible. He SHOULD pay.
Because either he initiated it and that makes him responsible, or he could have said *No* just as everyone expects the girl to, and he didn't.
The hypocrisy of the *Boys will be boys, it's OK for them to sleep around* while the girl catches all the blame and is slandered with pejoratives if SHE does, is beyond disgusting.
Funny how the girl who sleeps around is labeled as a *slut* while the guy who sleeps around isn’t.
He’s just as morally culpable.