To: Salvation
The one wearing the attire should not be burdened with difficult requirements, nor should the viewer be burdened by facing undue temptation.
What undue temptation? What will such a viewer do? Renounce his marital vows and fly down to Rio to proposition a female volleyball player?
If a viewer is so moved by the sight of the female form that he is tempted to violate morals and ethics, that is entirely the problem of the viewer, not of the viewed. This is no different than saying that I should not go out wearing a fine watch because I may tempt someone into stealing my watch, or stealing a watch from someone else. This is victim-blaming and Islamic Shariah pretzel-logic, and I want no part of it.
To: AnotherUnixGeek
“This is victim-blaming and Islamic Shariah pretzel-logic, and I want no part of it.”
Well stated. A significant number of people on FR think men are animals. That attitude gets old.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson