Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: boatbums; Iscool

.
No The word of Yehova is in perfect agreement with what I posted.

The word “new” is in every case a mistranslation, which is upheld by the context in which it is used.

Yeshua confirmed the covenant in his blood that was foretold by Jeremiah, which covenant was ancient.

Also the covenant was with the two houses of Israel who are the assembly, not with an imaginary church. Jeremiah establishes this fact well.

It has to be understood that all of our translated Bibles had to please the nobility of the time at which they were produced, all of whom wanted a church under their control rather than Yehova’s assembly.
.


680 posted on 08/12/2016 7:57:56 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor
The word “new” is in every case a mistranslation, which is upheld by the context in which it is used....
It has to be understood that all of our translated Bibles had to please the nobility of the time at which they were produced, all of whom wanted a church under their control rather than Yehova’s assembly.

Gee...you sound just like the Mormons who claim only "their" Bible is translated correctly. How about you go back to those verses I posted and tell us how you would translate them? Their context is pretty clear.

Also, you realize, I hope, that we actually have manuscript copies in the original languages with which we can go back and check for those "translation errors", don't you?

691 posted on 08/12/2016 7:51:45 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 680 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson