Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: faithhopecharity

Unfortunately Bergoglio most surely did.

While Vennari is not my cup of tea, if anything he is understated in his reporting.


7 posted on 06/20/2016 10:17:26 PM PDT by SGNA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: SGNA

it is so sad
while fidelity (even outside of marriage) is often a noble trait,..

surely a Christian priest should state views that do not advocate or enable or encourage or reward cohabitation without benefit of marriage...or sound like they do

the last thing we need are more unmarried people shacking up (frequently as a practical matter, and of course always as well as a spiritual concern)


10 posted on 06/20/2016 10:22:19 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians are not born. They're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: SGNA
Finally, we must remember that the solution does not lie in returning the supposed good old days of Benedict XVI and John Paul II, two Vatican II revolutionaries whose modernist, ecumenical policies produced the current upheaval (e.g., it was John Paul II who raised both Kasper and Bergoglio to the rank of Cardinal). Rather, the answer is a return to full integrity of Catholic doctrine in the same meaning and the same explanation of what the Church always held, and to the counter-revolutionary, anti-Modernist framework of the greatest Pontiff of the 20th Century, Pope St. Pius X. No other solution will do.

Amen. It is so good to see that John Vennari is rightly equating Benedict with all of the other Modernists.

15 posted on 06/21/2016 5:57:13 AM PDT by piusv (The Spirit of Christ hasn't refrained from using separated churches as means of salvation:VII heresy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson