Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Petrosius
The issues appear to be essentially trivial, to me. Others will disagree but when one renders them down, they're essentially to do with protocol and feeling "slighted". Human pride and childishness, in other words.

In the case of the Antioch Patriarchate, it is currently involved in a "jurisdictional dispute" with the Jesrusalem Patriarchate and therefore felt unable to participate in the Eucharist. As a result, it withdrew. A turf war by any other name.

As for the Bulgarians, they listed six objections. These included the absence from the agenda of the council topics of particular importance for Orthodox Christianity “that have contemporary relevance and require a timely Pan-Orthodox Council resolution”.

The Bulgarian Synod did not say what these topics were.

The Holy Synod said that the Autocephalous Orthodox Churches had already officially declared disagreements on some of the texts already approved for the council meeting.

It also objected to the rule that at the Pan-Orthodox Council, texts being discussed would not be subject to editing in the course of discussions.

Further, the Bulgarians objected that the proposed seating arrangements for the primates of the Orthodox Churches in the meeting room “violates the principle of equality of the primates of the Autocephalous Orthodox Churches”.

It also objected to the “inappropriate location of observers and guests of the Pan-Orthodox Council”.

Finally, the Holy Synod objected to the need to undertake “large and unjustified” expenses for the Bulgarian Orthodox Church to take part in the Pan-Orthodox Council.

I'd call that "trivial"

As for the Serbians, who knows? However, I suspect that both the Serbs and the Bulgarians have been put up to this by Moscow which doesn't really want the Council to go ahead and this is its way of flipping the bird to the Ecumenical Patriarchate in Constantinople.

4 posted on 06/09/2016 7:47:37 AM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: marshmallow; Petrosius

“As for the Serbians, who knows? However, I suspect that both the Serbsc and the Bulgarians have been put up to this by Moscow which doesn’t really want the Council to go ahead and this is its way of flipping the bird to the Ecumenical Patriarchate in Constantinople.”

That’s very likely with the Slavs but highly unlikely with the Antiochians. Their complaint about the Pat. of Jerusalem is sound and in the Orthodox world generally seen as very important. Jurisdiction and jurisdictional boundaries are ancient canonical matters with consequences far beyond any conception the Latin Church might have. The Bulgarian complaints, like the Church of Bulgaria, are nonsense. In the meantime, Black Bart of Istanbul seems to be way over playing his hand. As we learned years ago during the “Spyridon Wars”, the best way to rein him in is cut off the money. That darn near lead to his removal by the other crowned heads in the Synod. He removed Spyridon and the money tap opened.

If this Council goes through and anything even remotely controversial comes out of it, we’ll reject it and him too.


5 posted on 06/09/2016 8:28:36 AM PDT by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen and you, O death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson