Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Partisan Gunslinger
Renowned Catholic archaeologist Milik confirmed Peter's ossuary in Jerusalem. The rest is biblical.

I have read of Father Miliks theories and while they are certainly interesting,they are in no way conclusive. I believe they came about in the 1950's or thereabout and I'm pretty sure that they have been or are being researched for their validity.

447 posted on 03/27/2016 7:47:23 PM PDT by terycarl (COMMON SENSE PREVAILS OVER ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies ]


To: terycarl
I have read of Father Miliks theories and while they are certainly interesting,they are in no way conclusive. I believe they came about in the 1950's or thereabout and I'm pretty sure that they have been or are being researched for their validity.

Oh yeah, it's a funny story. After Peter's ossuary was found in Jerusalem and confirmed by Milik, the Vatican immediately came up with a set of bones they found in a wall and were Peter's, as they said. Well, on further study it was a collection of animal bones and the bone of a woman. So the Vatican went back and immediately found another set of bones somewhere there, that the pope's personal archaeologist confirmed was Peter's, but the archaeologist wasn't named and no one else is allowed to study them. Now that's desperate. lol

449 posted on 03/28/2016 8:49:55 AM PDT by Partisan Gunslinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson