Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Ransomed

Fair enough. I suspect that anyone who harms another innocent is not likely to confess their deed in the first place.


13 posted on 03/01/2016 7:38:04 PM PST by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: soycd

If the harmers of innocence confess, or the victims, it’s always going to look the same as far as the priest is concerned. A dude with a collar saying ‘No comment.’ That’s why they could never defend themselves, no matter if it is legit or not.

Freegards


16 posted on 03/01/2016 7:50:14 PM PST by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: soycd
Neither the penitent nor the confessor was guilty of abuse in this case. The penitent was the abuse victim, and the court was trying to compel the confessor to tell what the victim had said in the confessional.

Which is something they have no business doing.

17 posted on 03/01/2016 7:59:32 PM PST by Campion (Halten Sie sich unbedingt an die Lehre!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson