Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o
The immediate priority, of course, would be to get women out of a rape danger zone.

That can mean "anywhere where there are men."

For instance a diaphragm and spermicide.

Can you cite me a Church document giving this permission to use diaphragms and spermicides?

29 posted on 02/18/2016 8:28:13 PM PST by Dajjal (Justice Robert Jackson was wrong -- the Constitution IS a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Dajjal
1. I think this assertion is ove-the-top. I don't have such a low opinion of men, and crime ststistics do not bear out your idea that most men are a significant rape risk.

2. No one needs "permission" from the Church the State or anyone else to use protective body armor. The same applies to a barrier in the vagina. A barrier is not a sin. Choosing contraceptive sex is a sin.

I know you would like to see a more definitive statement. I'm just on my way to Mass and I have my mother-in-law's funeral in the afternoon, so I might not be able to get to it for you. You might try googling Congo 1960 rape Catholic nuns diaphragm

If you find anything interest4ing, pleas post us a link because I'd like to read it, too.

32 posted on 02/19/2016 5:06:19 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (What does the LORD require of you, but to act justly, love tenderly, and walk humbly with your God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson