Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ealgeone; metmom
"I think mm’s question is a valid one. Do you not have an answer?"

Because you aren't interested in an answer, you're hoping for a blurb, without context or fullness (which sums up how Protestant doctrine comes about, btw). You don't really care about incredulity vs. apostasy vs. schism vs. heresy, either formal or material. You don't care about the balance between obedience and the need to rebuke. You don't care about the weight of Doctrine and the role of Sacred Tradition.

If I'm mistaken and you really do care, feel free to study up.

66 posted on 01/31/2016 7:56:11 PM PST by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Don't Tread On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Wyrd bið ful aræd; ealgeone

Again, a cop out.

The question remains unanswered as usual.

I find it interesting that Catholics won’t/can’t answer whether the Holy Spirit led the College of Cardinals in their selection of the pope.


73 posted on 01/31/2016 8:09:53 PM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd
I care about if the Word is being rightly handled. I really don't care about roman catholic tradition as it contains false doctrines. What is in "sacred tradition" that is not in the Word that is essential for having eternal life?

John notes in two places we have all we need to know on how to have eternal life.

86 posted on 01/31/2016 8:27:09 PM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson