[Mrs. Don-o]

Pope Francis meets with people quite frequently on a private basis, and in such cases the Papal Press Office (Fr. Lombardi) always says that there will be no further details because the meeting was confidential or pastoral.

The people coming out of a private or pastoral meeting may claim their relationship, predicated on sinful sexual relations, was declared OK by the pope; but they might be lying, too.

When a person's supposed gay identity has been a public issue, that person has sometimes been been publicly rejected.

Vatican says ‘no' to transsexual godparents amid Spain controversy (LINK)

Pope Francis 'refuses' gay French ambassador (LINK)

Pope's Shocking Hitler Youth Comparison (Pope blasts gender theory)(LINK)

[ebb tide]

You're scraping the bottom of the barrel.

Lombardi, another Jesuit, is constantly tasked, as hard it may be, in trying to “interpret” what Bergolio is “vomiting out his mouth”.

[ebb tide]

Pope Francis meets with people quite frequently on a private basis, ...

That's funny. The petty Bergolio, at last notice, cancelled his private meeting with the good Cardinal Bagnasco.

Care to explain why Bergolio allows photos of him warmly greeting a homosexual couple, but not of his meeting with Kim Davis?

Here's what Lombardi had to say of Francis' meeting with Kim Davis:

The Pope did not enter into the details of the situation of Mrs. Davis and his meeting with her should not be considered a form of support of her position in all of its particular and complex aspects.

[ebb tide]

The people coming out of a private or pastoral meeting may claim their relationship, predicated on sinful sexual relations, was declared OK by the pope; but they might be lying, too.

Are you serious? If these people are lying why doesn't the Vatican defend Bergolio and speak the truth?