Posted on 01/03/2016 10:27:14 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
You may have noticed that pretty much everything Jorge Bergoglio says is a meaningless pastiche of drooling nonsense, punctuated by a core vocabulary of dogwhistle words, and for those of you who have actually heard him speak, the gutteral, slackjawed verbal tick, âEehh?â
You can tell who his drooling sychopants are, because they pick up and conspicuously litter their speech and writing with these dogwhistle words and phrases. For me, these words are now ruined â rendered totally unusable by Bergoglio and his fag toadies. Just as no more boys can ever be named âAdolfâ (Sorry Coors family!), these words and phrases will now incite spittle-flicked nutties whenever they fall upon the ears of decent, God-fearing human beings.
1. Encounter
This is a dogwhistle for faggots. Faggots have âencountersâ in grotty toilets, bathhouses and Novus Ordo seminaries. Encounters are brief meetings. Wham, bam, thank you, Fr. Rosica. (Go ahead and sue me Tom, you diabolical fag. You can get in line to all claims on my non-existent estate right behind the IRS. Heh.)
2. Dialogue
This is faggot-speak for moral relativism and/or modernism. There is no Truth, and we donât actually believe what we believe. Dialogue.
3. Exclude/include
Bergoglio, being an illiterate moron, seems to not understand that EXCLUDE is a transitive verb, meaning it takes an object. Or does he� For example:
The Church excludes PERTINACIOUS HERETICS.
The Church is the subject. Excludes is the transitive verb. Pertinacious heretics is the direct object.
Bergoglio uses exclude and include like a cudgel, as intransitive verbs, just hanging there without an object, as he makes his strawman arguments. âJesus includes and never excludes.â Jesus includes WHAT OR WHOM? Unrepentant sodomites? Satanists? Jesus never excludes WHAT OR WHOM? Baby killers? Nazis? Musloids?
Using exclude and include as intransitive verbs is a dogwhistle for moral relativism.
4. Closeness
Ew. Again, another faggot dogwhistle, conjuring images of Roman bathhouses or stopped elevators in Montevideo.
5. Accompany
Another faggot dogwhistle. I wonât judge you in your despicable, filthy sin. Heck, Iâll ACCOMPANY YOU! And if you have a particularly pillowy Brad Pitt lips, why then Iâll evenâ¦
6. Accompany body-to-body
Quite possibly the single most faggoty phrase ever uttered in human history.
7. Tender, tenderness, tenderly
Well. I guess we can never, ever, ever listen to âLove Me Tenderâ ever again. Thanks for ruining everything, including ELVIS, fags.
8. Caress, caressing
Drop this one and all fags within a half-mile radius will come running. Er, make that, sashaying. Snap.
9. Tenderly caressing
This is the veritable Bat Signal of the fags. Drop this one and a pink phone somewhere in Casa Santa Marta rings. See below.
ricca-pope-francis_2622725k
10. The Poor
This is now a dogwhistle for any and all âvictim classesâ, including fags, adulterers and all aberrosexuals. Anyone whose behavioral choices that the Church and Divine and Natural Law condemn, are unrepentant, and who will become cheering fanbois for FrancisNewChurch, can be classified as âthe poorâ. Oh, it is also boilerplate Marxist class warfare incitement.
Email more if you think of them.
The bottom line is this: I judge people who have conspicuously weaved any of these terms into their writing or speech since Bergoglioâs squatting on the See of Peter VERY, VERY HARSHLY. These are shameless asskissers who are trying to weasel their way into and ingratiate themselves before the FrancisNewChurch Mafia. Make absolutely no mistake, people who pick up and use these now wretch-inducing terms are throwing billowing smoke signals that they are for sale and ready to play ball with Bergoglio, his toadies and their utterly satanic pro-sodomy, anti-Christ agenda.
You can smell âem a mile away. If you come across anyone using this fetid sodomite dogwhistle language, run in the opposite direction before you or someone you love gets tenderly caressed in an unwanted body-to-body accompaniment.
“and remember it is all in God’s hands...”
Now that’s in God’s hands, what is He going to to, start nuclear war?
from a posted remark:
God is in control b/c He prompts good men & women to do His will. What God wants happens b/c, prompted by Him, people DO things. -Mundabor
I agree; prompted, people do things.
Insofar as I am aware in proper usage the word faggot means either a bundle of sticks tied together or a type of pulled thread work that resembles that (faggotting). It’s only relationship to homosexuality is a slang insult.
If she wants to right an article filled with insulting slang words while complaining about someone else’s language she’s free to do so, but don’t expect me to be impressed by her discourse.
“Insofar as I am aware in proper usage the word faggot means either a bundle of sticks tied together...”
Could its usage come then from the comparison of Sodomites to a bundle of sticks which are used to stoke the fires of hell? Such is admittedly quite a negative connotation, but as the Church has taught for centuries, Sodomy is one of the four sins which cry out to God for vengeance!
As such the committers of such sin are polluting society and do so historically with vile hatred of God and man while forcing the lifestyle on others.
In fact the abuse of one’s body in homosexual acts is possibly the most vile hate speech on earth as one perverts the intentions which God their maker placed in their very own body. It is hate for and rejection of the (Holy) Creator to do the very opposite of the intended design of the (Holy) Creator.
It is thus merciful to frighten the partakers in Sodomy by reminding them of the future that lies in store for unrepentant sinners: the flames of hell for ETERNITY.
I agree with everything you have said in this post.
Yes, it is “just plain vile”.
Yes, “this vile comes from the enemy, not from God”.
..........................................................
PS: I think you meant “humility” :-)
I don’t support faggotry but I do support good writing. That was my problem with that piece. The way it was written was repellent.
Even if men start a war or millions die, God will bring good out of evil in the long run. Romans 8:28
For a secular non Christian argument about this, look up Boethius....
but I do agree that God uses our hands to do his will...if we let him Alas often men prefer to ignore God’s will in order to get rich or powerful. But even then He will work things so that ultimately good results.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.