It happens that I was never compelled to jump on the Father Barron Express. Barron is too new and newbies have cost us a catastrophe from the White House.
If Barron was so positioned among the picker outers, who nominate these men for consideration, in Rome, I would chance to say that this appointment is no resume enhancer Barron.
Having said that, this article points to absolutely nothing of any magnitude worthy of such a silly rant, full of dramatic pronouncements that have nothing to do with Barron.
I’m sure he was hurt to see his old stomping grounds obliterated with bodies and explosives. We love the memories of our past. Obviously, Barron does too. Paris is a historic city, whose damage by loss of lives and treasure and mystique, and we are all grieving.
Ditto. His youtube videos are sufficient to form an unfavorable opinion. Non-violence is not a new theme for him (he even injects it into the Creation story, characterizing Creation as a "non-violent act of speech"). Mullarkey outlines the crucial distinctions which his superficial response to the Paris attacks fails to address.
Barron is too new and newbies have cost us a catastrophe from the White House.
As have ivory tower academics such as Fr. Barron (a theological liberal with a wide media reach who has established himself as an authority).
I agree that Barron has nothing to say here.