Roman irreverence toward The Scriptures is evidenced by their altering wording to support the magicsteeringthem assertions. The catholic Bible has alterations to passages so that the altered passages support heresies like thedeification of the Mother of Jesus, as one example.
Presuming the novel and unScriptural premise of ensured perpetual magisterial infallibility is akin to magic.
The catholic Bible has alterations to passages so that the altered passages support heresies like thedeification of the Mother of Jesus, as one example.
You mean such as "full of grace" in the Vulgate, while some RC translations have "highly faviored" or even "favored one' as the NAB.
But it is what Rome did not change that is the problem for them, as it would not have been hard to add one prayer to angels or saints in glory, or one so that souls may be released from purgatory, and or one command to the churches submit to the holy father in Rome, or a mention of NT pastors titled "priests" officiating at the Lord supper, offering it up as a sacrifice for sins, or of souls consuming such in order to obtain spiritual life, etc.
That all such are absent testifies against the Islamic assertion that the Bible was changed to say such things as they deny .