The CORRUPT Bishop of Rome and HIS Problematic Synod

The Deus Ex Machina Blog ^ | 10/16/15 | S. Armaticus

[BlatherNaut]

Gearing up for the BIG SHOW this upcoming week, I am republishing a post from the website of the US Society of St. Pius X. The original can be found here. The reason I am republishing this post is that it contains a compendium of links that give a very good big picture of what we have termed the Stealth Sex Synod™ of Bishops.

Furthermore I would like to draw your attention to Damian Thompson of the Spectator and to his Twitter account. I usually do not use Mr. Thompson as a source since I find some of his view questionable, to say the least. Having qualified, I would like to draw your attention to a recurring subject matter that runs through his posted Tweets, namely the scale of CORRUPTION in the manner in which this Synod was organized and is being executed. This CORRUPTION is not only evident for all to see, but is so glaring that even the most die-hard papal absolutists can no longer deny this fact...

...And finally, the REAL SYNOD begins Monday. As this blog has determined as early as December 18 of 2014, in a post titled The Synod of The Three Paragraphs (see here), and confirmed as recently as in the post titled The Trojan Horse (see here), the entire Synod was called for no other reason than to:

EXPUNGE THE TERM “INTRINSICALLY DISORDERED”, WHICH OBJECTIVELY DESCRIBES ABERRO-SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR, EXPUNGE IT FROM CATHOLIC MORAL DOCTRINE AND CODE OF CANON LAW.

Given the above, it follows that this week will be the CRUCIAL WEEK. To put this in more historical terms, this is the week where Francis and his forces of Heterodoxy will attempt to cross the Rubicon.

[piusv]

And finally, the REAL SYNOD begins Monday. As this blog has determined as early as December 18 of 2014, in a post titled The Synod of The Three Paragraphs (see here), and confirmed as recently as in the post titled The Trojan Horse (see here), the entire Synod was called for no other reason than to: EXPUNGE THE TERM “INTRINSICALLY DISORDERED”, WHICH OBJECTIVELY DESCRIBES ABERRO-SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR, EXPUNGE IT FROM CATHOLIC MORAL DOCTRINE AND CODE OF CANON LAW.

I don't doubt this.

[BlatherNaut]

It does seem to be the main interest of the loudmouthed, hand-picked Francis cabal which has been continuously grabbing headlines since the synod began.

[RitaOK]

Wasn’t it Damien Thompson who last week wrote a column and succinctly suggested the three possible schisms the Church could fall into— Progressive, Traditional, and Orthodox?

Frankly, that has made more sense to me than any other possible outcome of this catastrophe we are now witnessing in Rome.

Do you recall if it was Damien who wrote that piece?

[ebb tide]

No matter the author, what’s the difference between Orthodox and Traditional?

[Joe Boucher]

You all Catholics did a great job hiring this marxist to be your leader.
He seems to be nearly as bad as this jive punk ass fag negro we elected.

[piusv]

NO, I just went back to check. It was someone named Daniel Maguire. Also, the groups mentioned were Traditionalist, Magisterial and Progressive.

[RitaOK]

Couldn’t find that darned article, and really messed up on the Magisterial didn’t I? So sorry. I am grateful you remembered how to fish it out and correct me! Thank you!

Maguire did mention the Orthodox in his article and that stood out to me. I’m sorry I somehow stuck on the Orthodox, and injected the Orthodox into those three divisions, in the place of Magisterial.

Could you please send me a link to that article, since I muffed it so badly, I need to unstick my errors and get with the corrections. Thank you, p5!

[piusv]

Not a problem. Here was the original post:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3345924/posts

[Jim Noble]

three possible schisms the Church could fall into— Progressive, Traditional, and Orthodox?

The schism from Orthodoxy occurred in 1054 (ducking and running)

[RitaOK]

See #7. You are quite correct.

The correct divisions posited by the reporter were Progressive, Traditional, and Magisterial. I erred in substituting “Orthodox” for Magisterial.

He did discuss Orthodox and I locked onto that, unfortunately. But, my point remains that I don’t really argue with his suggestions here, they seem pretty much to be broadly accurate.

Unless Pope Francis speaks straight and defends already grounded teaching of Sacred Scripture, Apostolic teaching and many, many papal examples of defending Truth by the aforementioned, then how can a schism be avoided?

Frankly, there is already a sharply pseudo schism. It is seen everywhere.

[RitaOK]

Thank you a lot. I placed the thing in “saved” this time, in case anything comes of it, in future developments. :)

[Jim Noble]

Frankly, there is already a sharply pseudo schism. It is seen everywhere

Sing a New Church

(sung to “Nettleton,” the melody for “Come, Thou Fount of Every Blessing”)
~Delores Dufner, OSB

Summoned by the God who made us rich in our diversity Gathered in the name of Jesus, richer still in unity.

Refrain: Let us bring the gifts that differ and, in splendid, varied ways, sing a new church into being, one in faith and love and praise.

Radiant risen from the water, robed in holiness and light, male and female in God’s image, male and female, God’s delight.

Refrain

Trust the goodness of creation; trust the Spirit strong within. Dare to dream the vision promised, sprung from seed of what has been.

Refrain

Bring the hopes of every nation; bring the art of every race. Weave a song of peace and justice; let it sound through time and space.

Refrain

Draw together at one table, all the human family; shape a circle ever wider and a people ever free.

[RitaOK]

A good example.