Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: piusv

I agree. I did not say the branches would be legitimate. I’m saying that given the obvious chaos and pseudo schism already under way, the outcome for the Church, reportedly could very well become a three way schism. That article I referenced reasoned that there are basically three divisions already obvious in the Church.

The writer simply extrapolated out from the three divisions already obvious, that if they were made formal and official, then this is what the Church would look like, ie., Orthodox, Traditional and Progressive.

Just wondering how you answer that intelligently?

Are you Orthodox? I don’t happen to know where you are coming from.


22 posted on 10/12/2015 9:44:27 AM PDT by RitaOK ( VIVA CRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: RitaOK

I am a Traditional pre-Vatican II Catholic. A Catholic who follows the Traditional Catholic Faith before it was changed in 1960. So I would be someone who believes that the Church has already gone into schism. All we are seeing now is further fracturing as a result of the initial schism.

Not a popular view here for sure.


25 posted on 10/12/2015 9:53:28 AM PDT by piusv (The Spirit of Christ hasn't refrained from using separated churches as means of salvation:VII heresy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson