[Montana_Sam]

The article is fraudulent from its foundation.

The mention of a "17-year old gay Catholic" is an example. One can be gay, or one can be Catholic with same-sex attraction. The whole gay thing is political/sociological.

[Mrs. Don-o]

I hear you, and I know what you mean. But, confusingly, a lot of people use the word "gay" to mean either same-sex attracted OR involved in same-sex romantic/sexual relations OR an advocate for various variations (or perversions) of sexuality, without distinguishing one thing from another.

I have more than once misunderstood what another person was saying, because when they said "gay" I assumed they meant "involved in sexual vice," but thy really meant just "same-sex attracted."

You can say, "people shouldn't use the word 'gay' that way," but a lot of people do.

[cloudmountain]

The mention of a "17-year old gay Catholic" is an example. One can be gay, or one can be Catholic with same-sex attraction. The whole gay thing is political/sociological.

From the research I read, homosexuality is a choice that males/females make sometime in their early to mid-teens. At that age I don't believe that they can make sane choices anyway.

No one can figure out WHAT triggers that choice and why more males SEEM to choose it than females.

However, after years of research, the final word is that there are no gay, bisexual or non-sexual genes. It IS a choice. We are all built for heterosexuality, though trying to explain that to homosexuals is impossible.