To: Mrs. Don-o
1. Both spouses have to petition for it together, or if not, then the other party must at least consent to it.Sorry. It still sounds like uncontested "catholic divorce".
3 posted on
09/16/2015 3:52:27 PM PDT by
ebb tide
(We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
To: ebb tide
That's what gets them an expedited process. Not necessarily an annulment. The judgment can still be either "yes" or "no" for the petitioner.
I think a good chunk of the confusion around "Mitis" and "Mitis II" has been the wrong assumption that a quicker process means the attempted marriage will be found invalid. The default position is still that it will be quickly found valid.
6 posted on
09/16/2015 4:19:51 PM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
("The truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it." -- Flannery O'Connor)
To: ebb tide
It sounds like sharia finance. They cant pay interest so they call it principal even though they are paying more than the original amount borrowed.
Catholics want to divorce so they get an annulment. It is still a divorce.
11 posted on
09/16/2015 5:10:31 PM PDT by
joshua c
(Please dont feed the liberals)
To: ebb tide
Sorry. It still sounds like uncontested "catholic divorce". Do you understand the difference between a civil ceremony and a sacramental marriage and a religious ceremony marriage?
14 posted on
09/16/2015 6:01:28 PM PDT by
verga
(I might as well be playng chess with pigeons.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson