His corruption is evidenced by his deliberate publication of a document stating that homosexual relationships offer "a precious support in the life of the partners" -- an unambiguous rejection of God's Word. His scandalous strike against the indissolubility of marriage provides further evidence of his contempt for doctrine.
However the ambiguity and the context make this statement imprudent in the extreme, esp. in a published Vatican document.
I say "imprudent". I would even say "harmful". I don't say "corrupt", because it is not a blessing of shameful lust.
I refers= It refers
sin-sinful= UN-sinful
Note to self: do not post before adequate caffeine input.