In fact you've already taken off the table the ability to use the Bible for its defense.
You seem to take pride in being the "major domo Romanist" on this board as you have this posted on your home page.
This being the case I don't have the time to prove something to you you've already rejected.
If you don't believe God's Word is the final authority against which all teachings should be measured, then I cannot help you.
You may recall, our pleasant conversation started in #165 when you noted "without the immaculate conception, your redemption is bogus"
To which I replied that the Bible disagrees with you and listed a couple of verses to support this position.
I later asked could you show clearly in the text where it says Mary was immaculately conceived and believing that is a pre-condition for being saved to which your reply was in #180 the eloquent "heck no-and so what?.
As noted earlier, I answered your question back on #192. To which I put a question to you to which you've not answered. But I let that go figuring you couldn't answer the question without kicking the legs out from catholicism.
I also asked you a question in post #182 to which you never replied, but I'll repost for conversation:
So if your priest comes along and says you must stand on your head to be saved.....you gonna believe it?
As you've offered zero substantiation for any of your assertions and will not or cannot answer my questions I bid you a good evening.
Enjoyed chatting with you.
“As you’ve offered zero substantiation for any of your assertions and will not or cannot answer my questions I bid you a good evening.”
This is why I remain suspicious of Romulans... plus the whole cloaking thing.
Your unbiblical insistence on man made doctrines makes me sad.