It's my contention that the form Jesus had at the Thomas incident is not the form on the Mount of Transfiguration and no bones are coming out of any graveyard at the Seventh Trump.
Yes, as the firstborn from the dead ones, the firstborn of many believer brethren who will also be raised up out of the dead ones with flesh and bones, changed instantly from corruptible form to the incorruptible new human body form. He was accepted as the exact prototype (except for the nail print and pierced side wounds) and perfect example of what they and we are to be, seen of them and more than 500 others over a period of forty days before He manifested the ability to pass directly from their presence in this dimension into The God's dimension which shares a coexisting interface with our three-dimensional temporal world.
"Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: . . ." (Col. 1:15 AV; Jesus being the referent here).
"For whom he (The Father) did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he (His Son) might be the firstborn (from the dead) among many brethren" (Rom. 8:29 AV).
Note that regenerated believer-disciple-priest Christ-followers already have their new spiritual nature, coexisting with the old carnal nature in this husk of flesh and blood and bones.
The risen human Jesus commanded the faithless disciple, ". . . be not faithless, but believing. . . . Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed" (AV translation).
Be like Thomas yourself converted.
The only way out, to find the truths of Scripture, is to employ the hermeneutic of literal, historical, cultural, contextual method in which any passage of Scripture can have one, and only one, primary interpretation to which all the context of Scripture lends itself. though literal interpretation contains both plain literal language and figurative-literal language, Figurative and /or allegorical interpretation is not normal. Figurative interpretation causes problems because it reads something into literature that is not plainly stated, and makes communication impossible where there is no fixed standard--only opinion--of what is being said.
So, using it, you will only get into arguments, even with those who show you what the Scripture plainly says.
Every statement of Scripture has only one sense (Isaiah 53:5, cf 1 Peter 2:24; this is about one's spiritual state, not one's physical sickness, which many try to apply it thus perverting the meaning). When the plain sense of Scripture makes common sense--that is, commoonly accepted sense across the population--seek no other sense.
Got that?