Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Salvation

Did you really think that an article, by a Catholic apologist, on a topic of significant and complex disagreement, wouldn’t generate conflict? It seems like a no-brainer to me.


335 posted on 07/22/2015 5:03:20 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("All the time live the truth with love in your heart." ~Fr. Ho Lung)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick

“...wouldn’t generate conflict?...’

I can’t speak for anyone else, of course, yet it would seem that we can all feel free to post even controversial topics that will generate civil debate and even heated rhetoric; the problem is posts such as #50 that are pure sarcasm, snark and have nothing to do with honest discussion. That seems to be the actual issue.


340 posted on 07/22/2015 5:32:56 AM PDT by stonehouse01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick; MayflowerMadam

Post #50 is not controversy or argument. It is abuse (albeit pretty funny abuse. Personally, I’m distraught that I’ve been spelling Tiffani wrong all these years. No wonder I’m still overweight.)

In the midst of all this conversation about free will, mercy, grace, and love, the saints cannot avoid abuse?

Does that concern no one?


350 posted on 07/22/2015 6:11:53 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Sta, si cum canibus magnis currere non potes, in portico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson