Well, you asked Jim and he very directly refused to answer your question. So I think continuing to ask it at this point will get you no where.
Sometimes we have to take “No” as an answer. Not one we like, but it is an answer nevertheless.
I think you’re asking now just to argue against the whole premise. Because he’s not going to give you the answer you want—and it is obvious to everyone that that isn’t good enough for you.
My suggestion to you is go ahead and post articles you think are fair, and if they get removed, then you’ll know that Jim considers them bashing. If you continue to argue with him about it, I expect you’ll get banned.
This isn’t about me getting an answer. It is about respecting people who want to post and think “bashing” is totally inadequate to describe BANNED content. I respect an owners right to censor as long as they make their standard known to visitors so it doesn’t appear arbitrary. If it does appear arbitrary, I will leave anyway.
I also stopped asking Jim for an answer since he has definitely decided my question was unworthy of his sweat and effort, but I did ask others for their thoughts. I would give mine but I was curious about what others may think and did not want to prejudice their answers.