To: Jan_Sobieski
I’m always in favor of a Monarchy being removed. And I laugh at how monarchist apologists love to fawn about how benevolent they were.
The bottom line is that the Monarchy was absolute. The Roman church supported this and said his right to rule came from God, not from the people.
This is reason enough to revolt. And there was no way to do it that wouldn’t become bloody, not in Europe.
And much of the blame should be laid at the feet of the Vatican and the French Monarchy. Had they not engaged in their unholy enterprise and ruled by force rather than consent, the revolution would have never happened.
Claim to rue over others? You pays your money, you takes your chances.
18 posted on
07/14/2015 2:18:42 PM PDT by
DesertRhino
(I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
To: DesertRhino
So we are in agreement! You think the Bolshevik Revolution and Mao's takeover of China (both replacing Kings) were good! Everyone it entitled to their own opinion, but not all opinions are created equal.
By the way, you wont like Jesus Christ when He comes back then. He is coming back to rule and reign as King of Kings.
23 posted on
07/14/2015 2:32:25 PM PDT by
Jan_Sobieski
(Sanctification)
To: DesertRhino
I always felt something for English Bob in
Forgiven, not because he's a kind of monarchist, or "upper-class fake," as Richard Harris would say, but because of the way that beastly American sheriff kicked the sh!t out of him.
27 posted on
07/14/2015 3:06:18 PM PDT by
cornelis
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson