[Resettozero]

A person who can’t give a coherent account of what Trent means by “substance” can’t argue against the idea of transubstantiation.

Un-Biblical word game and obviously not true. Indicative of Catholic devout believers placing their faith in the mystical transubstantiation which the RCC has limited to the Mass/Eucharist.

It is a BELIEF of Catholics and some Protestants. It is NOT a FACT based on the Word of God but rather on a twisting, a misunderstanding at the least, of what Jesus said and meant.

[Mad Dawg]

What’s the game?

I already said I’m not defending the dogma. I don’t recall referring to it as a “fact.” I argued not FOR the dogma but against the article.

It’s a waste of time to argue against something we don’t teach and insist we do teach it. If that’s a word game, let it be so.